| |
LOAN
MODIFICATION ATTORNEY, BANKRUPTCY, FORECLOSURE
CALIFORNIA LOAN MODIFICATION,
MORTGAGE MODIFICATION, BAD CREDIT, NEVADA, ARIZONA
LOAN MODIFICATION, SHORT SALE, BAD
LOANS, BAD CREDIT MORTGAGE, HOME FORECLOSURE, FORECLOSURE
HELP,
AVOID BANKRUPTCY, AVOID FORECLOSURE, HAVE YOU BEEN TURNED
DOWN BY YOUR BANK?
You Have Questions and We Have Answers!
- "We Are
Attorneys!"
|
|
|
Services Loan
Modification Services for your home loan Credit
Counseling on your mortgage Bankruptcy
analysis because of a bad mortgage Litigation
Services Contracts Contract
Negotiation Services
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
CONTACT
US:
|
|
LOAN
MODIFICATION
ATTORNEYS
AT LAW .com

(888)678-6625
(888)678-NOBK
J.
Scott Souders, ESQ.
California
State
Bar Number 069425
Since 1976
Mike
Garcia
Real
Estate Mortgage Advisor
Since 1997
|
 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |

CALL US TODAY!
(888) 678-6625
ALL
ABOUT CALIFORNIA
ALL
ABOUT ORANGE COUNTY
LOAN
MODIFICATION ATTORNEY CALIFORNIA, LOAN MODIFICATION CALIFORNIA
ARIZONA NEVADA, ORANGE COUNTY, AVOID BANKRUPCTY OR FORECLOSURE,
CALIFORNIA LOAN MODIFICATION ATTORNEY,, LOAN MODIFICATION
ATTORNEYS IN CALIFORNIA, (888)678-6625, FORECLOSURE LOAN
MODIFICATION, FORECLOSURE LOAN MODIFICATION, BANKRUPTCY
LOAN MODIFICATION, HOME LOAN MODIFICATION, (888)678-6625,
LOAN MODIFICATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW ORANGE COUNTY, LOAN
MODIFICATION ORANGE COUNTY, LOAN MODIFICATION ATTORNEYS
AT LAW, FORECLOSURE LOAN MODIFICATION ORANGE COUNTY, FORECLOSURE
LOAN MODIFICATION, BANKRUPTCY LOAN MODIFICATION ORANGE
COUNTY, BANKRUPTCY LOAN MODIFICATION, HOME LOAN MODIFICATION
ORANGE COUNTY, HOME LOAN MODIFICATION, REFINANCE ORANGE
COUNTY, REFINANCE, FORECLOSURE ORANGE COUNTY, FORECLOSURE,
Bankruptcy, Bad Credit, Mortgage Refinance, Short Sale,
Refinance Loan, Loan Modification, Home Foreclosure, Short
Sales, Loans with Bad Credit, Short Selling, Foreclosure
Sale, Loans for people with bad credit, bad credit refinance,
Foreclosure Help, Debt Negotiation, , loan modification,
foreclosure help, mortgage help, mortgage modification,
real estate lawyer, mortgage Loan modification, loan modification
programs, mortgage foreclosure help, federal loan modification,
mortgage, loans, mortgage loan, mortgage loans, loan modification
agents, avoid foreclosure, foreclosure assistance, and
foreclosure help by approved loan modification attorney,
Loan Modification Lawyer in Orange County, CA - Mortgage
Modification Attorney, Los Angeles Family Lawyer | Experienced
Attorneys Protecting Your Legal Rights and Values, California,
, Aliso Viejo 92656, 92698, Anaheim 92801, 92802, 92803,
92804, 92805, 92806, 92807, 92808, 92809, 92812, 92814,
92815, 92816, 92817, 92825, 92850, 92899, Atwood, 92811,
Brea, 92821, 92822,92823, Buena Park, 90620 ,90621,90622,
90624, Capistrano Beach, 92624, Corona del Mar, 92625,
Costa Mesa, 92626, 92627, 92628, Cypress, 90630, Dana
Point, 92629, East Irvine, 92650, El Toro, 92609, Foothill
Ranch, 92610, Fountain Valley, 92708, 92728, Fullerton,
92831, 92832, 92833, 92834, 92835, 92836, 92837, 92838,
Garden Grove, 92840, 92841, 92842, 92843 ,92844, 92845,
92846, Huntington Beach , 92605, 92615, 92646, 92647,
92648, 92649, Irvine, 92602, 92603, 92604, 92606, 92612,
92614, 92616, 92617, 92618, 92619, 92620, 92623, 92697,
La Habra, 90631, 90632, 90633, La Palma, 90623, Ladera
Ranch, 92694, Laguna Beach , 92651, 92652, Laguna Hills
,92653, 92654,92607,92677, Laguna Woods, 92637,Lake Forest,
92630, Los Alamitos, 90720, 90721, Midway City, 92655,
Mission Viejo, 92690, 92691, 92692,Newport Beach , 92658,
92659, 92660, 92661, 92662, 92663, 92657, Orange, 92856,
92857, 92859, 92862, 92863, 92864, 92865, 92866, 92867,
92868, 92869, Placentia, 92870, 92871, Rancho Santa Margarita
92688, San Clemente, 92672, 92673, 92674, San Juan Capistrano,
92675, 92693, Santa Ana , 92701, 92702, 92703, 92704,
92705 ,92706, 92707, 92711, 92712, 92725.92735, 92799,
Seal Beach , 90740, Silverado 92676, Stanton, 90680, Sunset
Beach 90742, Surfside 90743, Trabuco Canyon, 92678, 92679,
Tustin ,92780, 92781,92782, Villa Park, 92861, Westminster,
92683, 92684, 92685, Yorba Linda, 92885, 92886, 92887
|
"How do you become famous? Helping people! Changing their
lives and making a difference in their lives. Loving them"
- Eric Brenn
|
|
We are Attorneys
that Help Homeowners
that have been turned down for modification.
______________________________________________________
We use our legal expertise for loan modifications to
avoid foreclosure and bankruptcy court.
A Loan Modification is a permanent change in one or more of
the terms of a mortgagor's loan, allows the loan to be reinstated,
and results in a payment the mortgagor can afford.
Loan Modification is arguably the most effective tool you can
use if you are behind on your mortgage and in midst of a financial
hardship to save your home from entering foreclosure. With a
loan modification, the mortgage loan is restructured so that
it is affordable and can fit comfortably into your budget rather
than being an overwhelming monthly drain on already tight finances.
Loan modification agreements come in different forms but quite
frequently they involve the reduction of mortgage's interest
rate for a specified period of time so the homeowner can continue
to make payments and stay in the home. Loans can also be modified
so they have a longer amortization term (e.g. 40 year instead
of 30 year) which will cause the payments to decrease. Principal
writedowns are rare, but they do indeed happen where the bank
actually writes down some of the principal amount.
Is Your Lender or Servicer
Not Helping You or Being Abusive...
Lenders and servicers are very busy with desperate homeowners
trying to save their homes from foreclosure. Unfortunately,
they do not have the man power or the capabilities to save everyone.
Many people are simply getting lost in the system and suffering
an unnecessary foreclosure when they could have worked it out
with their lender.
However, when a lawyer is involved, it seems as if the calls
start to get answered and the letters responded to. Often this
can make the difference between saving your home and losing
your home.
With an attorney involved, you have an important ally
in your corner to get you the mortgage help you need, FAST!
Do
I Really Need an Attorney?
There are many people advertising loan modifications services
on the Internet and through other media outlets. While some
of these people may be well-meaning and competent, troubled
borrowers need to keep in mind that there is a virtual "army"
of out-of-work loan officers, brokers, escrow officers, and
underwriters out there looking to make money. Many of these
mortgage professionals are the same ones who sold the toxic
loans that now need modification. Extreme caution should be
exercised when hiring someone to get you out of a bad loan.
To avoid falling victim to a predatory lender twice, we suggest
hiring an attorney, whether our firm or another.
These are just a few of the
questions you should get the answers to before you call your
lender/servicer. We are ready to answer your questions now.
Call 1(888) 678-NOBK (6625) Today
NOTE:
The information and notices contained on this website are intended
as general research and information and are expressly not intended,
and should not be regarded, as financial or legal advice. We
attempt to ensure that the material contained on the website
is accurate and complete at the date first published, however
you should recognize that information contained on this website
may become out of date over time. Readers who have a particular
question about real estate, mortgages, financing, or foreclosure,
or who believe they require legal counsel, should seek the advise
of an attorney

WHO
QUALIFIES FOR A LOAN MODIFICATION?
FREQUENTLY
ASKED QUESTIONS
- FAQ
Question
1:
How do I know if I qualify for a mortgage modification?
Answer:
Under the
government plan for a "Home Affordable Modification"
you must:
- Be
an owner-occupant in a 1-4 unit property.
- A
loan originated before January 1 2009.
- A
mortgage payment (including taxes, insurance and home
owners association dues) that is more than 31% of
your gross income, and have a mortgage payment that
is no longer affordable.
Who
is to say what you can afford: the bank, the government,
or you and your family?
Are there exceptions to these requirements?
Question 2: Must I be
behind on my mortgage payments to be eligible?
Answer:
No. Responsible borrowers who are struggling to remain
current on their mortgage are eligible.
Who decides if you are responsible and struggling?
Question
3: Is my lender required to modify my loan?
Answer:
If
you have missed 2 or more payments and your lender/servicer
is participating in the "Making Home Affordable Program",
your lender/servicer must evaluate your loan to
determine if you qualify.
Question
4: In utilizing the Loan Modification option to bring an asset
current, can the mortgagee include all fees and corporate advances?
Answer:
Mortgagee Letter 2008-21 states in part: Legal fees and related
foreclosure costs for work actually completed and applicable to
the current default episode may be capitalized into the modified
principal balance.
Question
5: May a mortgagee perform an interior inspection of the property
if they have concerns about property condition?
Answer:
Yes, the mortgagee may conduct any review it deems necessary to
verify that the property has no physical conditions which adversely
impact the mortgagor's continued ability to support the modified
mortgage payment.
Question 6: Can a mortgagee include late charges in the Loan Modification?
Answer:
Mortgagee
Letter 2008-21 states that accrued late charges should be waived
by the mortgagee at the time of the Loan Modification.
Question
7: When utilizing a Loan Modification option, can a mortgagee
capitalize an escrow advance for Homeowner's Association fees?
Answer:
HUD
Handbook 4330.1 REV-5, Paragraph 2-1, Section B, Escrow Obligations
states: Mortgagees must also escrow funds for those items which,
if not paid, would create liens on the property positioned ahead
of the FHA-insured mortgage.
Question 8: Is there a new basis interest
rate which mortgagees may assess when completing a Loan Modification?
Answer:
Yes, Mortgagee Letter 2008-21 states that the new basis interest
rate is 200 points above the monthly average yield on US Treasury
Securities, adjusted to a constant maturity of 10 years.
Question
9: Will HUD subordinate a Partial Claim, should a mortgagor subsequently
default and qualify for a Loan Modification?
Answer:
If a mortgagor subsequently defaults and qualifies for a Loan
Modification, HUD will subordinate the Partial Claim.
Question 10: Are mortgagees required to
perform an escrow analysis when completing a Loan Modification?
Answer:
Yes, mortgagees are to perform a retroactive escrow analysis at
the time the Loan Modification to ensure that the delinquent payments
being capitalized reflect the actual escrow requirements required
for those months capitalized.
Question
11: Is the mortgagor eligible for the upfront premium refund at
payoff of a modified loan?
Answer:
It depends upon when the closing date occurred. For assets closed:
After
July 1, 1991 but before January 1, 2001, the 7-year unearned
premium refund schedule shown in Mortgagee Letter 1994-1 remains
in effect,
On
or after January 1, 2001 that are subsequently refinanced, the
5-year refund schedule shown in the attachment of Mortgagee
Letter 2000-46 applies, or
On
or after December 8, 2004, refunds of upfront MIP are eliminated
except, when the mortgagor refinances to another FHA insured
mortgage. The refund schedule attached to Mortgagee Letter 2005-03
has been modified to a 3-year period.
Question
12: Can a mortgagee qualify an asset for the Loan Modification
option when the mortgagor is unemployed, the spouse is employed,
but the spouse name is not on the mortgage?
Answer:
Based upon this scenario, the mortgagee should conduct a financial
review of the household income and expenses to determine if
surplus income is sufficient to meet the new modified mortgage
payment, but insufficient to pay back the arrearage. Once this
process has been completed the mortgagee should then consult
with their legal counsel to determine if the asset is eligible
for a Loan Modification since the spouse is not on the original
mortgage.
FACT
OR FICTION
4 QUESTION QUIZ
1) Lenders are giving principal reductions = Fiction.
In the first half of 2008, less than a quarter of 1% of loan modifications
had a principle reduction. The lenders prefer to give an affordable
payment and lower interest rate instead of lowering the principal
balance.
2) Anyone can get a loan modification = Fiction. There must
be a hardship and / or a reason that the borrower can no longer
afford the payments whether its an adjustable rate or not.
3) Loan
modifications are only a temporary fix. = Fiction. Even though
some loan modifications are temporary, there are permanent solutions
that will keep your payments affordable for up to 40 years.
4) A lower mortgage payment is always the answer. = Fiction.
Many homeowners also have thousands of dollars in unsecured debt.
If you already have a low interest rate on your home loan and
credit card payments are high, debt settlement may be a way to
keep you in your home.
Loan Modification has become the solution of choice
for people facing unaffordable mortgages and foreclosure, but
as the market for mortgage assistance grows, the number of misinformed
homeowners is also rising steadily. A lot of people enter loan
modifications with serious misconceptions, and end up making the
wrong decisions, based on inaccurate information.
So how do you tell fact from fiction? Can a loan modification
really stop foreclosure and solve all your mortgage problems?
This guide shows you some of the most common myths about loan
modification, and the truth behind them.
Myth #1: You can do it on your own.
Technically, you can—but it takes a lot more work and the results
probably won’t be the same. Loss Mitigation is one of a bank’s
busiest departments; a typical loss mitigation officer can handle
as many as 800 cases at a time.
These people are overwhelmed and do not have time to deal with
your problem adequately. It’s not uncommon to be passed from one
agent to another, and never get any real answers.
A loan modification attorney, on the other hand, can talk directly
to your lender, and use significant leverage to get your file
to the top of the agents’s stack. When a lawyer represents you,
the calls get returned faster, you get more personalized service,
and you gain the capability to actually obtain the type of loan
you can need.
Myth #2: Your lender would rather foreclose than modify your
loan.
In some cases, foreclosure is the more practical option. But according
to a Tower Group study, lenders lose substantial money with every
foreclosure, and are required to increase their reserves in addition.
The banks already own too many foreclosure properties and have
too many non-performing loans on their books. They would much
prefer to adjust your mortgage to something affordable and convert
your loan into a performing asset. Don’t be intimidated by threats
of foreclosure.
Myth #3: You can’t stop the foreclosure process.
It’s true that your chances dwindle the longer you wait, but until
your home is auctioned off, no one can really kick you out. A
loan modification can stop the process as close as seven days
before the sale date. This buys you enough time to get back on
your feet while your lawyers work out a better arrangement with
your lender. Of course, it’s always better if you take steps early
on.
Myth #4: It’s an instant solution to mortgage problems.
Loan modifications really work, but they take time, the right
expertise, and money. Depending on how far behind you are, the
process can take anywhere from one to three months. But since
it stops the foreclosure process, you won’t have to worry about
losing your home while the modification is under way. If you submit
your paperwork on time and cooperate with your lawyer, you can
speed up the process and avoid complications.
Myth #5: You need good credit to qualify.
Standard requirements vary from lender to lender, but the bottom
line is that the loan modification should make financial sense
to your bank. Your credit rating doesn’t have anything to do with
it. Your lender will want proof that falling behind was a temporary
snag, and that you can afford to stay on track if they do modify
your loan. This means you have to have a job and a valid proof
of hardship. You don’t need to disclose your credit rating in
most circumstances
Myth #6: Loan Modification companies are scams. Companies take
your money, but don’t really do any thing.
In any business there are always some unscrupulous people, but
you can find legitimate organizations that will help you. The
important idea in loan modification is to work only with an experienced
and knowledgeable law firm or attorney who has a track record
of success. You should thoroughly check on the background of anyone
who claims to be able to do a loan modification before you spend
your money.
To get in touch with a good loan modification attorney today
(888)
678-6625
STEPS
IN PREVENTING FORECLOSURE
1.
Identify any deadlines, especially a foreclosure sale date, as
a completed foreclosure sale will usually end a homeowner's ability
to take preventative action. The mortgage loan services should
be contacted to obtain this information.
2.
Determine the cause
of the default and what financial issues need to be resolved to
get back on track and prevent foreclosure.
3.
Evaluate current
income through tax returns and other proof and expenses through
examination of bills to determine a realistic budget and what
amount is available to make mortgage payments.
4.
Look for ways to
increase income or sell assets that could be devoted to mortgage
payments.
5.
Reduce other financial
obligations such as other mortgages, property taxes and liens,
property insurance, PMI, utility payments, credit cars and other
unsecured debts, and student loans to devote more to the foreclosure
avoidance plan.
6.
Begin saving based
on the identified budget toward the foreclosure avoidance plan.
7.
Determine amount
of mortgage payments, any arrears, and the total due on the mortgage.
8.
Request a delay
of the foreclosure sale by providing preliminary information about
a workout plan or an offer of partial payment. Get an agreement
in writing.
9.
Determine the type
of loan and what workout options apply both to retain the home
and, if applicable, when giving up the home. The options might
include repayment plans, forbearance plans to suspend or temporarily
reduce the mortgage payment, short sales, deed transfer in lieu
of foreclosure, assumption of the mortgage by a third party, modification
of the original loan due to a reduction in net income. Examples
may include reduction in the interest rate, extension of the loan
period, capitalization of the missed payments and reamortization,
balance reduction.
10.
Other related options
might include bankruptcy, litigation of loan errors or abusive
practices.
To
get in touch with a good loan modification attorney today
(888)
678-6625
There
is something wrong with our system when millions of homeowners
can't afford to make their mortgage payments, meanwhile the lenders
and investment banks are getting bailouts with our tax dollars.
Here you will find honest answers to your mortgage modification
questions. And the latest information on who qualifies for the government
Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan.
Call today at 1(888) 678-NOBK(6625).
Do not miss your chance to get a mortgage modification just
because you got the wrong information.
|
 |
| |
|
LOAN
MODIFICATION NEWS
New
California Law SBx2 7 Will Delay Foreclosure.
Don't be threatened while you are working with your lender/servicer
to modify your mortgage.Here are some tips for homeowners.
DON'T
pay money to people who promise to work with your lender
to modify your loan. It is unlawful for foreclosure consultants
to collect money before (1) they give you a written contract
describing the services they promise to provide and (2)
they actually perform all the services described in the
contract, such as negotiating new monthly payments or
a new mortgage loan. However, an advance fee may be charged
by an attorney, or by a real estate broker who has submitted
the advance fee agreement to the Department of Real Estate,
for review.
DO
call your lender yourself. Your lender wants to hear from
you, and will likely be much more willing to work directly
with you than with a foreclosure consultant.
DON'T
ignore letters from your lender. Consider contacting your
lender yourself, many lenders are willing to work with
homeowners who are behind on their payments.
DON'T
transfer title or sell your house to a “foreclosure
rescuer.†Fraudulent foreclosure consultants often promise
that if homeowners transfer title, they may stay in the
home as renters and buy their home back later. The foreclosure
consultants claim that transfer is necessary so that someone
with a better credit rating can obtain a new loan to prevent
foreclosure. BEWARE! This is a common scheme so-called
“rescuers†use to evict homeowners and steal all or
most of the home's equity.
DON'T
pay your mortgage payments to someone other than your
lender or loan servicer, even if he or she promises to
pass the payment on. Fraudulent foreclosure consultants
often keep the money for themselves.
DON'T
sign any documents without reading them first. Many homeowners
think that they are signing documents for a new loan to
pay off the mortgage they are behind on. Later, they discover
that they actually transferred ownership to the “rescuer.â€
DO
contact housing counselors approved by the U.S. Department
of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), who may be able
to help you for free. For a referral to a housing counselor
near you, contact HUD at 1-800-569-4287 (TTY: 1-800-877-8339)
or www.hud.gov.
Homeowner Affordability and Stability
Plan
You may be eligible for a loan modification or other
relief. This relief could include, an interest rate reduction,
a conversion into a standard fixed rate loan, a principal
reduction, a deduction of all delinquent payments, and absolution
of all late payment penalties and fees. Certain conditions
do apply.
Millions of responsible Homeowners can get relief even if
your lender tells you that you don't qualify for a modification.
As many as 7-9 million Homeowners' are specified for relief,
but there are exceptions to these guidelines.
Statement
by
Timothy F. Geithner
U. S. Secretary of the Treasury
before the
Senate Banking Committee
May 20, 2009
Since
January, the Administration has spent considerable effort
developing and implementing a comprehensive plan for stabilizing
our housing market. Working with the Federal Reserve,
along with enacting programs to help provide more financial
strength to the GSEs, we helped bring overall mortgage
interest rates down to historic lows.
We
launched a new program called Making Home Affordable to
make it possible for millions of American homeowners to
refinance and take advantage of those lower interest rates.
And
we put in place a program to reduce the monthly mortgage
payments for eligible borrowers. This loan modification
program ensures monthly mortgage payments are at most
31 percent of a person's income for five years.
On
April 6, building on MHA, Treasury announced a major inter-agency
effort to combat mortgage rescue fraud and put scammers
on notice that we will not stand by while they prey on
homeowners seeking help to avoid foreclosure.
On
April 28, Treasury announced a Second Lien Program so
that, when a Home Affordable Modification is initiated
on a first lien, servicers participating in the Second
Lien Program will automatically reduce payments on the
associated second lien according to a pre-set protocol.
Servicers alternatively have the option to extinguish
the second lien in return for a lump sum payment under
a pre-set formula determined by Treasury, allowing servicers
to target principal extinguishment to the borrowers where
extinguishment is most appropriate. Treasury also announced
steps to incorporate the Federal Housing Administration's
(FHA) Hope for Homeowners into MHA.
And
on May 14, Treasury announced new details on Foreclosure
Alternatives and Home Price Decline Payments. The
Foreclosure Alternatives are meant to prevent costly foreclosures
by providing incentives for servicers and borrowers to
pursue short sales and deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure in
cases where a borrower is eligible for a MHA modification
but unable to complete the modification process.
The Home Price Decline Protection Incentives will provide
additional payments based on recent home price declines,
and therefore will incentivize additional modifications
in areas where home prices have been falling.
To
date, MHA's progress has been substantial. Fourteen servicers,
including the five largest, have signed contracts and
begun modifications under our program. Between loans
covered by these servicers and loans owned or securitized
by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, more than 75 percent of
all loans in the country are now covered by MHA.
The 14 participating servicers have extended offers on
over 55,000 trial modifications and mailed out over 300,000
letters with information about trial modifications to
borrowers and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have acquired
thousands of refinancings for high loan-to-value (LTV)
borrowers.
Since
the launch of its new automated underwriting system on
April 4, Fannie Mae has had over 233,000 eligible refinance
applications through DU Refi Plus, with over 51,000 of
these having LTVs between 80 and 105 percent. More than
3,650 Home Affordable Refinance loans have closed and
been delivered to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac already.
These application volumes indicate the desire of homeowners
to take advantage of the Administration's program.
Since
the Treasury released guidelines for servicers under MHA
on March 4, close to 3 million borrowers have accessed
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loan look-up tools online to
see if they have a loan eligible for refinancing.
Just two weeks after the guidelines were released Treasury
also launched www.makinghomeaffordable.gov,
a website dedicated to helping empowering homeowners with
the tools to gather information about the program and
determine whether they might be eligible. The site has
received more than 17.7 million page views in less than
two months.
AP
IMPACT: Gov't mortgage partners sued for
abuses
By
DANIEL WAGNER (AP) August 5, 2009
WASHINGTON
Billions of dollars the government is spending to help financially
pressed homeowners avert foreclosure are passing through
and enriching companies accused of preying on the people
they're supposed to help, an Associated Press investigation
has found.
The
companies, known as mortgage servicers, are middlemen who
collect monthly payments from homeowners and funnel the
money to the banks or investors who hold the loans. As the
only link between borrowers and lenders, they're in the
best position to rework the terms of loans under the government's
$50 billion mortgage-modification program. The servicers
are paid by the government if the changes keep homeowners
from falling behind on payments for at least three months.
But
the industry has a checkered history. The AP found that
at least 30 servicers have been accused in lawsuits of harassing
borrowers, imposing illegal fees and charging for unnecessary
insurance policies. More recently, the companies also have
been criticized for not helping homeowners quickly enough
delays that lead to more fees for homeowners and profits
for servicers.
The
biggest players in the servicing industry Bank of America,
Wells Fargo & Co., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Citigroup
Inc. all face litigation, some of which has led to settlements
with homeowners. All will receive federal money to modify
loans.
But
the industry's smaller players, which specialize in servicing
riskier subprime loans and loans already in default, face
harsher accusations that they systematically abused borrowers.
"The
irony is, in essence, the government is paying servicers
to do their job, which is to do loan modifications where
appropriate," said Kurt Eggert, a law professor at Chapman
University in Orange, Calif. "And that's not a part of their
job they were ever especially good at."
The
government says it has no choice but to partner with the
servicers because they are the only link between borrowers
and the investors who indirectly own their mortgages through
securities. The companies acknowledge there have been abuses
in their industry but argue many cases hinge on technicalities.
They say borrowers facing foreclosure often sue out of desperation,
trying to slow down the foreclosure process with frivolous
allegations.
When
President Barack Obama announced the plan, called the Home
Affordable Modification Program, in March, he said it would
help up to 4 million homeowners avoid foreclosure. But only
about 200,000 loan modifications are under way. Last week,
25 mortgage-servicing executives were summoned to the Treasury
Department for meetings at which they promised to deliver
300,000 more loan modifications by Nov. 1.
Under
the loan-modification program, 38 servicers will earn fees
to help reduce the monthly payments of homeowners facing
foreclosure. The goal is to modify mortgages so homeowners'
payments don't exceed 38 percent of their gross monthly
income.
Without
government aid, servicers don't have enough financial incentive
to modify mortgages. Each year, they earn about one-quarter
to one-half percent of the value of the loans they service,
so the larger the mortgage, the more they make. They earn
less if the loan is modified, usually by lowering the interest
rate or principal or adjusting the term.
The
servicers also make money through late fees, or by foreclosing.
The paperwork necessary to execute a foreclosure can generate
hundreds of dollars in fees for some servicers.
Under
the Treasury program, the servicers could pocket more than
$5,500 for each loan they modify. But they won't be paid
until the homeowners have made timely payments for three
months. The servicers will also get government money to
give to mortgage investors to compensate them for reducing
the loans. How much will depend on what it costs the investors
to modify the loan.
The
largest mortgage servicing abuse lawsuit was brought against
Select Portfolio Servicing, which was accused of imposing
illegal fees and charging borrowers for insurance they did
not need.
The
company paid $55 million in 2003 to settle charges brought
by the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the
Federal Trade Commission. It is eligible for up to $660
million under the Obama plan some to keep and some to pass
on to investors and homeowners.
Most
complaints against servicers allege similar abuses. Servicers
often dispose of the harshest charges by settling without
admitting guilt, as Select Portfolio did in 2003.
An
AP analysis of the 38 servicers the government is paying
to help vulnerable homeowners found that:
_
At least 30 face lawsuits from homeowners and advocates
claiming they charged illegally high fees, prematurely foreclosed
on homes and engaged in illegal collection practices. Most
of the suits allege violations of laws that protect homeowners
in foreclosure and prevent debt-collection abuse. Treasury's
program requires servicers to comply with these laws.
_
At least 14 have been accused of misleading customers before
the program began about whether they would qualify for loan
modifications or how low their new payments might be. In
many such cases, servicers are accused of telling borrowers
not to make payments because their applications for modifications
were pending and moving to foreclose anyway.
_
At least three of the companies settled federal predatory
collection allegations by pledging to correct their behavior.
They have since been sued hundreds of times by homeowners
who allege the same illegal practices.
"There
is no question that there have been significant abuses by
servicers, and a big part of that is there's no one who
is carefully monitoring their work to make sure that they're
not taking advantage of borrowers," Eggert said.
In
the past, loan servicing was a sleepy corner of the mortgage
industry. Servicers did little more than open envelopes
containing mortgage payments and forward money to investors.
The
business became far more profitable during the housing boom.
The proliferation of mortgages sold to risky, or subprime,
borrowers created an opening for the servicing business.
They specialized in collecting from people less likely to
make timely payments, and profited as late fees mounted.
Servicers
wanted this business so much that they sometimes bid more
than they could reasonably expect to make back for handling
a pool of loans, said Daniel Hedges, an attorney with Mountain
State Justice Inc., a nonprofit West Virginia law office
that represents homeowners facing foreclosure. As a result,
some servicers began adding fees that weren't due or otherwise
overcharging borrowers, he said.
As
borrowers fell behind on their loans, the servicers pocketed
more late fees, foreclosure fees and negotiation fees. Some
even profited from foreclosures.
In
February 2005, Janet Simmons was more than $30,000 behind
on her mortgage. Bayview Loan Servicing began foreclosure
proceedings on her home, located on 3.1 acres in rural Rockingham
County, Va., between Washington and Charlottesville.
But
Bayview which stands to receive up to $44.3 million from
Treasury's loan-modification program foreclosed without
providing required written notice, the Virginia State Supreme
Court found. Bayview never sent Simmons a letter by certified
mail, as required under her loan.
Unbeknownst
to Simmons, the home was sold at auction in July 2005. She
didn't find out she had lost the house until the new buyer
asked why she was doing yard work on a home she no longer
owned, said her lawyer, Kevin Rose.
The
courts awarded Simmons $156,809 the difference between what
her home was worth and what it had received in a foreclosure
sale.
Simmons
could not be reached for comment. A spokesman for Bayview
did not return repeated phone calls requesting comment.
Rose
said he gets "a lot of calls where it's clear something
was done wrong (by the servicer) and it's clear you could
reverse the foreclosure."
But
Rose and other housing lawyers said many cases of servicer
abuse go unreported and unpunished regardless of the evidence.
In many states, there are no clear laws awarding legal fees
to borrowers' attorneys when servicers have acted improperly,
Rose said.
"Servicers
have flown under the regulatory radar," said Julia Gordon,
senior policy counsel with the Center for Responsible Lending,
a Durham, N.C.-based advocacy group.
For
six years, Jerry Turner made payments to Select Portfolio
for a Charleston, W.Va.,
house he no longer owned.
In
2000, Turner was promised a loan modification in a court
settlement. His mortgage belonged to a bank-owned pool of
loans eventually serviced by Select Portfolio. Instead of
lowering Turner's payments as the court had ordered, the
bank foreclosed on Turner's home, court documents show.
The bank then took the house back at auction.
Select
Portfolio never told Turner his house had been sold. Instead,
it continued sending him monthly invoices and cashing his
checks. He didn't find out he had lost the house until it
was sold a second time, at auction because Select Portfolio
hadn't paid property taxes on the home.
"I
had excellent credit at one time," Turner said. "Now, I
can't borrow money on the house, I can't leave it, and it's
been tied up so much I don't know what to do."
Turner's
case against Select Portfolio is pending in West Virginia
state court.
Borrowers
facing foreclosure often don't know who holds their mortgage.
They have few options other than to sue their servicers
for mishandling collections or failing to give adequate
notice before foreclosing.
Servicers
sometimes face frivolous lawsuits. But many servicers in
line for government money are accused of ongoing, systematic
abuses.
As
part of its 2003 settlement with regulators, Select Portfolio,
promised to end practices including collecting illegal fees
and forcing borrowers to buy insurance. But the company,
now owned by the investment bank Credit Suisse Group, has
since been named in dozens of lawsuits alleging similar
violations. A 2008 complaint in West Virginia state court,
for example, alleged that the company charged homeowners
thousands of dollars in unauthorized late fees and other
charges.
Select
Portfolio spokesman Craig Bullock said the company doesn't
comment on inquiries "about our practices and so forth."
Another
servicer, Ocwen Financial Corp., was found in 2004 to be
engaged in illegal, unsafe and unsound collection practices.
Ocwen settled with regulators by promising to comply with
laws on foreclosure and debt collection and to try to find
out if homeowners had insurance before charging them for
its own, costlier insurance.
Ocwen,
which is in line to receive up to $553.4 million from the
Treasury, faces a federal class-action complaint for harassing
homeowners with excessive phone calls, charging illegal
fees and adding unnecessary insurance premiums to borrowers'
bills.
Ocwen
engaged in "a nationwide scheme of illegal, unfair, unlawful,
and deceptive business practices," the complaint contends.
Paul
Koches, Ocwen's general counsel, disputed the allegations
and noted the court has rejected one part of the lawsuit
concerning illegal fees. "We have a deep and continuing
commitment to foreclosure prevention," he wrote in an e-mail.
The
charges against Select Portfolio and Ocwen are unusual in
their scope and severity. But at least 28 other companies
on Treasury's list also have been charged with, and in many
cases settled, similar accusations.
Treasury
says it has no choice but to work with all servicers, no
matter how dubious their records. Refusing to work with
a particularly bad player would "deprive homeowners who
have mortgages with that servicer from getting modifications,"
Treasury spokeswoman Jenni Engebretsen said in a statement.
AP
Real Estate Writer Alan Zibel contributed to this report.
Banks
Fall Short on Mortgage Help
Govt.
Report Shows 15 Percent of Eligible Borrowers Offered
Help; Bank of America, Wells Fargo Lag Behind Other Big
Banks
By
MATTHEW JAFFE and ALICE GOMSTYN
August
4, 2009
The
Treasury Department today released the first report on
the performance of loan servicers in the Obama
administration's home mortgage modification program
-- and the numbers weren't pretty.
Only
15 percent of eligible homeowners
have been offered assistance under the Home Affordable
Modification Program thus far, according to the report,
and some loan servicers have yet to modify a single loan.
"There
are some institutions that have done an infinitesimally
small amount," Assistant Treasury Secretary for Financial
Institutions Michael Barr told reporters on a conference
call this morning.
"We
are going to be requiring ramped-up effort across the
board," he noted. "We're going to pay more specific attention
to ensuring that institutions that have been slow out
of the blocks ramp up more quickly and more effectively."
Among
the companies that have not modified any loans were American
Home Mortgage Servicing and National City Bank. Bank
of America had a 4 percent assistance rate for trial
modifications, with Wells Fargo marginally better at 6
percent.
"We're
disappointed in the performance of some of the servicers,"
Barr said. "We think they could have ramped up better,
faster, more consistently and done a better job of serving
borrowers and bringing stabilization to the broader mortgage
markets and economy and we expect them to do more."
Wells
Fargo defended its loan modification results in an interview
with ABCNews.com today.
"I
think what's important to keep in mind is the HAMP program
is a very good program but, relative to the first seven
months of 2009, it's just a piece of the overall story,"
said Mike Heid, co-president of Wells Fargo Home Mortgage.
Heid
said that, from January to July, the bank modified a total
of 240,000 loans. More than 20,000 were modified through
HAMP while the rest of the modifications took place through
separate Wells Fargo programs.
Bank
of America also touted its own loan modification programs,
saying that it modified 150,000 home mortgages in the
first half of the year.
American
Home Mortgage said in a written statement that it had
joined HAMP late last month and will begin loan modifications
under the program soon. The company said it had completed
64,000 loan modifications through its own programs between
July of 2008 and this June.
At
least two loan servicers and their parent banks, meanwhile,
are drawing fire for not participating in the government's
program at all: Litton Loan Servicing, which is owned
by Goldman Sachs, and Barclays' HomEq Servicing Corp.
"No
program can work unless people actually sign on and do
it," said Gloria Swieringa of ACORN, a non-profit low-income
advocacy group. "It's like leading a horse to water and
not letting him drink."
ACORN
has labeled mortgage servicers that don't participate
in the program as "homewreckers," but both Litton and
HomEq could escape the designation soon.
A
HomEq spokesman told ABCNews.com that the company has
signed an agremeent to participate in HAMP and expects
"confirmation of our HAMP servicer status momentarily."
Litton said in a statement today that it hopes to "formalize
its participation in the Treasury program soon."
Litton
said it has offered more than 35,000 trial modifications
using terms "consistent with the Treasury program" since
it was announced. Litton modified another 44,000 loans,
the company said, in the 12 months before the start of
the program.
Under
the government's program, some servicers helped as many
as one in five qualified borrowers with a trial loan,
according to today's report. JPMorgan Chase had a 20 percent
trial loan modification rate, as did GMAC Mortgage Inc.
Saxon Mortgage Services came in at 25 percent and Aurora
Loan Services 21 percent. CitiMortgage Inc. has begun
modifications for 15 percent of its eligible borrowers.
"There
are many servicers that are performing at quite high levels
and our expectation is that other servicers will come
up to that high level," Barr said.
Loan
Modifications: Banks Have a Long Way to Go
Upon
unveiling the plan in February, the administration said
that the $50 billion program was intended to help 3 to
4 million borrowers.
They've
got a long way to go: As of now, 235,000 loan modifications
have begun. Officials said today that they want to reach
500,000 borrowers by Nov. 1.
"It's
increasing by 30,000 or more a week," White House economic
advisor Lawrence Summers said on NBC's "Meet the Press"
Sunday. "We expect it to be half a million by Nov. 1 and
we're going to be holding the banks accountable for performance
under that program."
Barr
said today that, so far, the pace of modifications is
too slow.
"We
are more than on track to reach 3 to 4 million borrowers
over the next three years," he said, "but, in our estimate,
that is not fast enough and it's not good enough. We can
do better. We want banks to reach borrowers more quickly
and we are significantly increasing our efforts to reach
borrowers as fast as humanly possible."
Queens,
N.Y., homeowner Jean-Andre Sassine said he was surprised
to see JPMorgan Chase's relatively high loan modification
totals. JPMorgan Chase has offered loan modifications
to 30 percent of program-eligible homeowners who are more
than 60 days delinquent on their mortgage bills and begun
modifications for 20 percent of homeowners, according
to the government's report
"That
sounds great on paper," Sassine said. "Yet, I'm having
such a hard time reaching someone."
A
Chase customer, Sassine said he has made countless phone
calls to the bank, asking for a loan modification after
losing his job last year.
Thus
far, he's had no luck. Either his calls aren't returned
or they get lost in a maze of transfers to various departments,
Sassine said.
A
JPMorgan Chase spokesman said he didn't have information
on Sassine's case specifically, but acknowledged that
the bank still has work to do on its loan-modification
system.
"We've
done a lot of modifications for borrowers and we know
there's unprecedented levels of volume in the industry
and there are some people we may not be doing as quickly
as they would like or as we would like," spokesman Tom
Kelly said. "But we've been adding staff, we've been adding
technology, we've been adding space for staff aggressively
for the last six months, so we continue to get better
at it."
Are
Banks Really Trying?
Other
banks, too, say they've continued to devote more resources
to mortgage modifications but such claims are met with
skepticism by advocates like Ira Rheingold, the executive
director of the National Association of Consumer Advocates.
Rheingold
said mortgage servicers won't make real strides in foreclosure
prevention until they have stronger incentives motivating
them. Right now, under HAMP, servicers receive $1,000
from the government for every borrower that makes payments
for three straight months. For three years of regular
payments, servicers receive up to $4,500.
In
addition, Freddie Mac is conducting random audits to find
out whether borrowers are being improperly rejected for
loan modifications.
Rheingold
and others argue that struggling homeowners should have
the option of having their loans modified by a bankruptcy
judge -- an idea often referred to as a "cramdown."
The
threat of having bankruptcy judges order loan modifications,
he said, should be enough to motivate mortgage servicers
to pursue more modifications on their own, early on.
"It's
an incentive to get the mortgage industry off their collective
rear ends and really get moving here because suddenly
[homeowners] will get some leverage," Rheingold said.
For
now, future reports on loan modifications will help make
clear if the government's existing efforts to improve
the program are working.
"The
proof's going to be in the pudding," Barr said.
Posted
date: 7/29/2009
PennyMac
Goes Public
By
RICHARD CLOUGH
Los
Angeles Business Journal Staff
PennyMac,
the company started by former Countrywide Financial Corp.
executives, raised $320 million in an initial public offering
Wednesday.
The
Calabasas company, founded last year to invest in distressed
mortgages, sold 16 million shares at a price of $20 each,
said PennyMac spokeswoman Ray Johnson. The proceeds fell
short of the $400 million the company hoped to raise.
This
marks the first local IPO since North Hollywood hospital
patient management company IPC the Hospitalist Co. Inc.
went public in January 2008.
PennyMac,
short for Private National Mortgage Acceptance Co., has
said it intends to use proceeds from the IPO to invest
in three areas: mortgage portfolios from failed banks
being liquidated by regulators, loans acquired through
the U.S. Treasury Dept."s Public-Private Investment
Program and loans directly acquired from other banks.
Backed
by money manager BlackRock Inc. and hedge fund Highfields
Capital Management, PennyMac has raised more than $500
million from private investors that it has used to buy
portfolios of distressed mortgages, which it plans to
revive through loan modification and other programs.
To
go public, the company created a subsidiary structured
as a real estate investment trust, known as PennyMac Mortgage
Investment Trust, which will effectively be the operating
arm of the company.
PennyMac
has been controversial, with critics assailing its founders
as profiting from risky mortgage loans they promoted while
at Countrywide. PennyMac was started by Stanford Kurland,
the former No. 2 executive at Countrywide behind Chief
Executive
Angelo
Mozilo. At least 10 other PennyMac executives came from
Countrywide.
A
major subprime lender, Countrywide suffered considerable
loan losses before being sold at a fire-sale price last
year to Bank of America Corp. Mozilo and two other former
Countrywide executives were recently sued by the Securities
and Exchange Commission for allegedly misleading shareholders
as the company was deteriorating. No PennyMac executives
were named in the SEC lawsuit.
PennyMac"s
offering was underwritten by Merrill Lynch, Credit Suisse
and Deutsche Bank. The stock will trade on the New York
Stock Exchange beginning Thursday under the symbol PMT.
Under Operation Loan Lies, 189 lawsuits, cease-and-desist
orders and other legal actions have been filed in 20 states.
In Southern California, prosecutors have moved against
14 firms and 21 people.
By
Nathan Olivarez-Giles
July 16, 2009
For
Rene Ruelas, the calls came faster than weeds sprouting
in the yard of an empty house.
Foreclosure was looming for the Buena Park home that Ruelas
shared with his wife, Rose, and four children. The longshore
mechanic was headed into his fourth month without a paycheck
because of a workers' compensation dispute as he recovered
from his second knee surgery in a year. He was desperate.
"They
made it seem so simple," he said of the telephone solicitations
that began late last year. "They said they were given
my information from the bank and that I just had to
pay the money upfront and they'd do all the footwork."
Ruelas said he paid about $4,000 over five weeks to
a company that never even contacted his lender to modify
his home loan.
Now Ruelas and his family are on
the cover of a DVD the Federal Trade Commission
is sending out in an effort to curb the calls and mailers
that have helped dupe hundreds of thousands of homeowners
out of hundreds of millions of dollars.
The
DVD -- along with a flurry of lawsuits -- was unveiled
Wednesday as a part of Operation Loan Lies, a nationwide
crackdown by federal, state and local authorities on those
who prey on homeowners desperate for mortgage relief.
"At the moment, there are more scammers than there are
government officials going after them," California Atty.
Gen. Jerry Brown said at a news conference in downtown
Los Angeles. "There are more of these rats coming out
of these holes than we can stomp on, but we'll keep doing
the best we can."
Although the announcement was made Wednesday, the operation
has been underway for weeks, FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz
said.
So far, 189 lawsuits, cease-and-desist orders and other
legal actions have been filed in 20 states as a result
of Operation Loan Lies, officials said.
In Southern California, prosecutors have taken legal action
against 14 companies and 21 people accused of running
loan-modification scams that ripped off thousands of struggling
homeowners looking to avoid foreclosure.
In documents filed in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles
and Orange counties, Brown and the FTC alleged that the
California firms charged $500 to $5,500 in upfront fees,
often promising to get lenders to modify mortgages to
make payments more affordable -- and never delivered.
For a upfront fee of $3,500, one alleged victim was promised
a 40% reduction in her mortgage principal and a $2,000
reduction in her monthly payment by U.S. Homeowners Assistance,
one of the lawsuits said. After learning in April 2008
that her loan modification request had been denied, the
woman discovered that the Irvine company had forged her
signature and falsified her financial information, the
suit said.
Leibowitz said that homeowners should be wary of loan
consultants requiring payment before services are performed.
Federal and California lawmakers are working on rules
to block loan modification services from demanding upfront
payments.
Hundreds of thousands of homeowners have been victimized
by loan modification scams, Leibowitz said, estimating
monetary losses in the hundreds of millions of dollars.
And the fraudulent schemes are more rampant in Southern
California than in any other part of the U.S., he said.
"Part of the reason why we're out here today is because
California consumers have been among the most hard hit
and also because a lot of these malefactors are based
in Orange County," Leibowitz said. "It's one of the hotbeds
of mortgage scam activity."
Brown and the FTC are demanding millions in civil penalties
and restitution for homeowners as well as permanent injunctions
to prevent the defendants and companies from offering
mortgage-relief programs.
Twenty-three state and local agencies from 18 states are
working with the FTC under the effort, and that number
is expected to grow dramatically by the end of the year,
Leibowitz said.
nathan.olivarezgiles
@latimes.com
New California Law Passed To Delay Foreclosure For 90
Days (SB7).
This bill will provide California homeowners fair
chance at a mortgage loan modification before a foreclosure
can take place.
The FTC directs you to free
counseling offered
SEC. 4. Section 2923.53 is
added to the Civil Code, to read:
2923.53. (a) A mortgage loan servicer
that has implemented a comprehensive loan modification
program that meets the requirements
of this section shall have the loans that it services
exempted from the provisions of Section 2923.52, upon
order of the commissioner. A
comprehensive loan modification program shall include
all of the following features:
(1) The loan modification program is intended
to keep borrowers whose principal residences are homes
located in California in those
homes when the anticipated recovery under the loan modification
or workout plan exceeds the anticipated recovery through
foreclosure on
a net present value basis.
(2) The loan modification program targets
a ratio of the borrower' s housing-related debt to the
borrower's gross income of 38 percent
or less, on an aggregate basis in the program.
(3) The loan modification program includes
some combination of the following features:
(A) An interest rate reduction, as needed,
for a fixed term of at least five years.
(B) An extension of the amortization period
for the loan term, to no more than 40 years from the original
date of the loan.
(C) Deferral of some portion of the principal
amount of the unpaid principal balance until maturity
of the loan.
(D) Reduction of principal.
(E) Compliance with a federally mandated
loan modification program.
The net of this story is that Goldman Sachs
(GS)
has agreed to pay the state of Massachusetts $60 million
to settle a dispute regarding Goldman"s predatory
lending practices in and around Boston. $50 million will
be made available to reduce the loan principle on 714
individual mortgages. Of note is that the agreement called
for reductions in principal of as much as 30% for traditional
mortgages and up to 50% on second mortgages. Also of note
is that the State of Massachusetts gets to keep $10mm
for their efforts. Not bad for Attorney General Martha
Coakley.
This means next to nothing for Goldman Sachs. However,
a very dangerous precedent has been set. In the critical
years 2005-2007 Goldman was ranked 15th in the League
Tables for sub prime and Alt-A origination/securitization.
Goldman"s management must be pleased as punch with
that poor showing today. Those that ranked high on that
list are no doubt consulting with their attorneys.
If Goldman gets its hand slapped for $60mm over 714 mortgages
what does this mean for Countrywide Financial (CFC)?
They were very big in Boston. Merrill Lynch was at the
top of those securitization tables. That is what got Stan
O"Neal fired. If the settlement in Boston is representative
of what will be forthcoming then Bank of America (BAC)
is going to be facing a very big number. And that is just
Massachusetts. The AGs in the all of the other states,
especially Florida, Nevada, Arizona and California must
be licking their chops at this news.
One hears a lot about loan modifications these days. So
far there are two basic approaches:
I) The borrower is given relief in the form of a lower
interest rates and stretched-out maturities. The homeowner
stays in the home.
II) The bank will accept a deed in lieu of the mortgage.
The homeowner is out of the home.
There have been very few cases where a homeowner is allowed
to stay in the home and achieve a principal reduction.
The Boston settlement opens the floodgate for principal
reduction. It is the essence of the agreement. All 714
borrowers are now eligible for principal reduction and
the money is just sitting there waiting to be collected.
One can imagine the conversations between neighbors in
Boston:
A: Good news finally! I just got 35% net off my first
and second mortgage.
B: Wow! How did you manage that?
A: I was lucky enough to get my mortgages through Goldman
Sachs. They did a deal with the Mass AG and I win the
lotto!
B: I have my mortgages with Indy Mac Bank (IDMCQ.PK)
can I get reduction too?
A: Sure. Here is the number to call. Now lets party!
This is lining up badly for the banks. The States are
broke. They will see this as a source of revenue. Politicians
will also like it. They will be able to claim that they
are helping their constituents. Word on this will spread
quickly from borrower to borrower. Every one of them will
be looking for a break.
The settlement makes an important distinction between
first and second mortgages. The rights of the second mortgages
are clearly subordinated in the deal. This is how a bankruptcy
court would treat the two classes of debt. This provides
a clue on how these "seconds" will be treated
in the future.
One of the largest sources of these second mortgages is
the Mortgage Insurance Industry. They provide a guaranty
of payment on the first loss of 20%. This product competed
with the second mortgage industry. It created the same
result for the borrower, the ability to buy a home with
no money down. Precisely what Goldman is paying up for.
In this case what quacks, walks and swims like a duck
is likely to be treated like a duck.
Fannie Mae (FNM)
and Freddie Mac (FRE)
hold tens of billions of these insured or "enhanced"
mortgages. FHFA recently reported that the Agencies collectively
held or guaranteed 30.2 million mortgages. Of that amount
16%, or 4.8 million are identified as Non Prime . Put
differently, the Agencies hold 6,000 times more non-prime
mortgages then Goldman originated in Boston.
At this point it is not at all clear what the broader
implications of the Goldman settlement will be. This development
has put the issues of lender liability and principal reduction
on the table. It is unlikely they will come off the table
anytime soon.
SEC.
4. Section 2923.53 is added to the Civil Code, to
read:
2923.53. (a) A mortgage loan servicer that has implemented
acomprehensive loan modification program that meets the
requirementsof this section shall have the loans that
it services exempted fromthe provisions of Section 2923.52,
upon order of the commissioner. Acomprehensive loan modification
program shall include all of thefollowing features:
(1) The loan modification program is intended to keep
borrowerswhose principal residences are homes located
in California in thosehomes when the anticipated recovery
under the loan modification orworkout plan exceeds the
anticipated recovery through foreclosure ona net present
value basis. (2) The loan modification program
targets a ratio of the borrower's housing-related debt
to the borrower's gross income of 38 percentor less, on
an aggregate basis in the program. (3) The
loan modification program includes some combination of
thefollowing features: (A) An interest rate
reduction, as needed, for a fixed term of atleast five
years. (B) An extension of the amortization
period for the loan term, tono more than 40 years from
the original date of the loan. (C) Deferral
of some portion of the principal amount of the unpaidprincipal
balance until maturity of the loan. (D) Reduction
of principal. (E) Compliance with a federally
mandated loan modificationprogram.The net of this story
is that Goldman Sachs () has agreed to pay the state of
Massachusetts $60 million to settle a dispute regarding
Goldman"s predatory lending practices in and around
Boston. $50 million will be made available to reduce the
loan principle on 714 individual mortgages. Of note is
that the agreement called for reductions in principal
of as much as 30% for traditional mortgages and up to
50% on second mortgages. Also of note is that the State
of Massachusetts gets to keep $10mm for their efforts.
Not bad for Attorney General Martha Coakley. This means
next to nothing for Goldman Sachs. However, a very dangerous
precedent has been set. In the critical years 2005-2007
Goldman was ranked 15th in the League Tables for sub prime
and Alt-A origination/securitization. Goldman"s management
must be pleased as punch with that poor showing today.
Those that ranked high on that list are no doubt consulting
with their attorneys. If Goldman gets its hand slapped
for $60mm over 714 mortgages what does this mean for Countrywide
Financial ()? They were very big in Boston. Merrill Lynch
was at the top of those securitization tables. That is
what got Stan O"Neal fired. If the settlement in
Boston is representative of what will be forthcoming then
Bank of America () is going to be facing a very big number.
And that is just Massachusetts. The AGs in the all of
the other states, especially Florida, Nevada, Arizona
and California must be licking their chops at this news.One
hears a lot about loan modifications these days. So far
there are two basic approaches:I) The borrower is given
relief in the form of a lower interest rates and stretched-out
maturities. The homeowner stays in the home.II) The bank
will accept a deed in lieu of the mortgage. The homeowner
is out of the home.There have been very few cases where
a homeowner is allowed to stay in the home and achieve
a principal reduction. The Boston settlement opens the
floodgate for principal reduction. It is the essence of
the agreement.
All
714 borrowers are now eligible for principal reduction
and the money is just sitting there waiting to be collected.
One can imagine the conversations between neighbors in
Boston:A: Good news finally! I just got 35% net off my
first and second mortgage. B: Wow! How did you manage
that? A: I was lucky enough to get my mortgages through
Goldman Sachs. They did a deal with the Mass AG and I
win the lotto! B: I have my mortgages with Indy Mac Bank
() can I get reduction too?A: Sure. Here is the number
to call. Now lets party!This is lining up badly for the
banks. The States are broke. They will see this as a source
of revenue. Politicians will also like it. They will be
able to claim that they are helping their constituents.
Word on this will spread quickly from borrower to borrower.
Every one of them will be looking for a break.The settlement
makes an important distinction between first and second
mortgages. The rights of the second mortgages are clearly
subordinated in the deal. This is how a bankruptcy court
would treat the two classes of debt. This provides a clue
on how these "seconds" will be treated in the
future. One of the largest sources of these second mortgages
is the Mortgage Insurance Industry. They provide a guaranty
of payment on the first loss of 20%. This product competed
with the second mortgage industry. It created the same
result for the borrower, the ability to buy a home with
no money down. Precisely what Goldman is paying up for.
In this case what quacks, walks and swims like a duck
is likely to be treated like a duck.Fannie Mae () and
Freddie Mac () hold tens of billions of these insured
or "enhanced" mortgages. FHFA recently reported
that the Agencies collectively held or guaranteed 30.2
million mortgages. Of that amount 16%, or 4.8 million
are identified as Non Prime . Put differently, the Agencies
hold 6,000 times more non-prime mortgages then Goldman
originated in Boston.At this point it is not at all clear
what the broader implications of the Goldman settlement
will be. This development has put the issues of lender
liability and principal reduction on the table. It is
unlikely they will come off the table anytime soon.
| Senate
defeats 'cramdown' legislation
|
| By
Silla Brush |
| Posted:
04/30/09 04:01 PM [ET] |
|
The
Senate on Thursday shot down a controversial
housing bill supported by the White House yet
widely opposed by the financial industry.
The bill, known as cramdown in the financial
industry, would have allowed homeowners to turn
to bankruptcy judges to write down the principal
and interest payments for their primary home
mortgages.
Democrats
fell 15 votes short of the 60 necessary to pass
the bill, with 12 Democrats including Sen. Arlen
Specter (Pa.) voting no.
|
The
45-51 vote was a stinging loss for Senate Majority Whip
Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), who has tried and failed to pass
the bankruptcy measure through the Senate for two years.
Durbin spent weeks in negotiations with Senate staff
and industry officials but could not produce a compromise
that would pass the Senate.
It passed the House in March, but immediately ran into
trouble in the Senate. Supporters argue that it is an
important tool to force mortgage servicers to modify
loans and reduce the mounting foreclosures that continue
to dog the housing market.
Senate Democratic leadership, recognizing that it would
not pass, stripped the measure from a separate housing
bill that would support the housing market and increase
the borrowing authority of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC).
I don"t know what the next step will be, said Durbin
before the vote. It"ll surely be the conference
committee and hopefully the House can keep some aspect
of bankruptcy reform in this. If we fail ... we"ll
wait another year and face a worse crisis and hope that
the banks won"t have as much clout.
At times over the past two weeks, Durbin and industry
officials appeared on the verge of a compromise package.
But even with the outlines of a compromise with the
industry in sight, industry sources cautioned that it
was unclear it would ever win the 60 votes necessary
for passage.
Republicans have remained steadfastly opposed to the
bill, and centrist Democrats have repeatedly raised
concerns.
It would result in higher interest rates for all home
mortgages, exactly what we don"t want, said Senate
Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.).
While JPMorgan Chase & Co., Wells Fargo, Bank of
America and The Credit Union National Association discussed
a compromise with Durbin, the financial industry trade
associations were broadly opposed to the measure. Senate
Democrats took aim at the banking lobby on Thursday.
They"re being almost lemming-like, for their immediate,
short-term interests, said Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.).
A dozen trade associations, including the American Bankers
Association, Financial Services Roundtable and Independent
Community Bankers of America, wrote to senators this
week that the bill would make things worse by adding
even more risk to the mortgage market.
Obama supports the bankruptcy provision, but the administration
did not mount a full lobbying push on Capitol Hill.
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner gave the bill lukewarm
support in congressional testimony.
Administration
officials have said that while it was part of the
president"s efforts to support the housing market,
it was not necessarily the centerpiece.
Industry officials had discussed limiting the bankruptcy
provision to subprime or nontraditional loans, but
Schumer and other Democrats squashed that effort early
in the talks.
Democrats voting against the measure were: Sens. Max
Baucus (Mont.), Michael Bennet (Colo.), Robert Byrd
(W.Va.), Byron Dorgan (N.D.), Tim Johnson (S.D.),
Mary Landrieu (La.), Blanche Lincoln (Ark.), Ben Nelson
(Neb.), Mark Pryor (Ark.), Jon Tester (Mont.), Tom
Carper (Del.) and Specter.
J. Taylor Rushing contributed to this article.
Change
to bankruptcy law passes House
Proposal,
which faces tough Senate fight, would allow judges
to reduce principal on a mortgage for a primary residence.
By
Jim Puzzanghera |Special
to The Morning Call
-
March 6, 2009
In
an attempt to ease the foreclosure crisis, the House
on Thursday approved a major change to bankruptcy law,
giving judges new powers to modify home mortgages.
The revision, which was approved 234-191 as part of
a broader housing bill, would allow bankruptcy judges
to reduce -- or ''cram down''-- the principal owed on
an existing mortgage for a primary residence.
First, however, homeowners would have to seek a voluntary
modification from their lender and share any profits
if they sell the house within five years.
The legislation faces a tougher road in the Senate,
although supporters there were optimistic that the nationwide
surge in foreclosures would help them pass it as early
as next week.
UPDATED
APRIL 22 2009
REPORTED BY BLOOMBERG NEWS
Senate Democrats led by Richard
Durbin are working with the banking industry on
the so-called cram-down bill, which passed the House
in March, to determine which loans are covered or
when the provision expires. The National Association
of Federal Credit Unions, representing more than 800
lenders, will not support or defend a proposal from
Durbin"s staff until getting additional details,
the group said today in a letter released in Washington.
The
association remains concerned about any legislation
that includes broad cram-downs of all mortgages in
bankruptcy, President Fred Becker wrote Durbin, the
second-ranking Senate Democrat. Credit unions are
pressing Congress to explain how second mortgages
and private mortgage insurance contracts are affected
before endorsing a bill.
The
Obama administration said revamping U.S. bankruptcy
law is a key part of its anti-foreclosure initiative
announced Feb. 18. The plan targets as many as 9 million
homeowners to help modify or refinance their mortgages.
The White House plans to spend $75 billion, mostly
from the $700 billion financial rescue package, to
assist borrowers aiming to stay in their homes.
Democrats
have five weeks to complete negotiations and vote
on mortgage legislation under a schedule set by Senate
leader Harry
Reid, said his spokesman, Jim
Manley. The Financial Services Roundtable, taking
part in talks on behalf of 100 banking, insurance
and investment companies, said opposition persists.
"Uphill
Battle"
The cram-down bill continues to face an uphill battle
and there are a lot of conflicting interests operating
on the stage, said Scott
Talbott, senior vice president of government affairs
for the Washington-based industry group. There is
no deal yet and the rest of the banking industry continues
to oppose it.
Republicans
opposed Durbin"s bill last year, and the bankruptcy
provision died amid veto threats from President George
W. Bush. Investors have said giving judges the
authority to reduce principal payments or adjust payment
plans may cripple the secondary mortgage market and
artificially raise interest rates. Citigroup Inc.
abandoned its opposition to endorse the Democratic
proposal on Jan. 8.
U.S.
foreclosure filings rose to a record 803,489 in the
first quarter, 24 percent more than a year earlier,
RealtyTrac, the Irvine, California-based RealtyTrac,
a seller of default data, said in a report last week.
ABOUT
LOAN MODIFICATION:
Loan
modification
is a process whereby a homeowner's mortgage is modified and
both lender and homeowner are bound by the new terms. The most
common modifications are lowering the interest rate, reducing
the principal balance, 'fixing' adjustable interest rates, increasing
the loan term, forgiveness of payment defaults & fees, or
any combination of these.
History
According
to the FDIC chairman, Sheila C. Bair, looking back as far as
the 1980s, "the FDIC applied workout procedures for troubled
loans out of bank failures, modifying loans to make them affordable
and to turn non-performing into performing loans."
The
US housing boom of the first half of this decade ended abruptly
in 2006. Housing starts, which peaked at more than 2 million
units in 2005, have plummeted to just over half that level,
with no recovery in sight. Home prices, which were increasing
at double-digit rates nationally in 2004 and 2005, are now falling
in many areas across the country (see Chart 1). As home prices
decline, the number of problem mortgages, particularly in sub-prime
and Alt-A portfolios, is rising. As of third quarter 2007, the
percentage of sub-prime adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) that
were seriously delinquent or in foreclosure reached 15.6 percent,
more than double the level of a year ago (see Chart 2). The
deterioration in credit performance began in the industrial
Midwest, where economic conditions have been the weakest, but
has now spread to the former boom markets of Florida, California,
and other coastal states.
Chart
1

Chart
2

During
2007, investors and ratings agencies have repeatedly downgraded
assumptions about sub-prime credit performance. A Merrill Lynch
study published in July estimated that if US home prices fell
only 5 percent, sub-prime credit losses to investors would total
just under $150 billion, and Alta credit losses would total
$25 billion. On the heels of this report came news that the
S&P/Case-Shiller Composite Home Price Index for 10 large
US cities had fallen in August to a level that was already 5
percent lower than a year ago, with the likelihood of a similar
decline over the coming year.
The
complexity of many mortgage-backed securitization structures
has heightened the overall risk aversion of investors, resulting
in what has become a broader illiquidity in global credit markets.
These disruptions have led to a precipitous decline in sub-prime
lending, a significant reduction in the availability of Alta
loans, and higher interest rates on jumbo loans (see Chart 3).
The tightening in mortgage credit has placed further downward
pressure on home sales and home prices, a situation that now
could derail the US economic expansion.
Chart
3

Residential
mortgage credit quality continues to weaken, with both delinquencies
and charge-offs on the rise at FDIC-insured institutions.
This
trend, in tandem with upward pricing of hybrid [[adjustable
rate mortgage|adjustable-rate mortgage] (ARM) loans, falling
home prices, and fewer refinancing options, underscores the
urgency of finding a workable solution to current problems in
the sub-prime mortgage market. Legislators, regulators, bankers,
mortgage servicers, and consumer groups have been debating the
merits of strategies that may help preserve home ownership,
minimize foreclosures, and restore some stability to local housing
markets.
On
December 6, 2007, an industry-led plan was announced to help
avert foreclosure for certain sub-prime homeowners who face
unaffordable payments when their interest rates reset. This
plan provides for a streamlined process to extend the starter
rates on sub-prime Arms for at least five years in cases where
borrowers remain current on their loans but cannot refinance
or afford the higher payments after reset. An important component
of the industry-led plan is detailed reporting of loan modification
activity. Working with the Treasury Department and other bank
regulators, the FDIC will monitor loan modification levels and
seek adjustments to the protocols if warranted.
Purpose
Sheila
Bair has “long advocated a systematic and streamlined approach
to loan modification that puts borrowers into long-term, sustainable
mortgages. I support the industry plan as a means to allow borrowers
to remain in their homes, provide investors with higher returns
than can be obtained under foreclosure, and strengthen local
neighborhoods where foreclosures are already driving down property
values. It is my hope that this plan will be implemented in
a way that delivers real progress on these important policy
goals.”
Under
the financial rescue package, the Treasury plans to directly
inject $250 billion of capital into US banks in exchange for
preferred shares. Nine of the largest US banks were essentially
arm-twisted into signing on for the first $125 billion in capital
infusions. "Those of us who have looked to the self-interest
of lending institutions to protect shareholder's equity ...
are in a state of shocked disbelief," said the former Fed chief.
"Specifically, the government could establish standards for
loan modifications and provide guarantees for loans meeting
those standards," Bair said. "By doing so, unaffordable loans
could be converted into loans that are sustainable over the
long term."Bair made clear that she considers existing voluntary
loan modification programs inadequate. "We are falling badly
behind and more needs to be done," she said on a day when RealtyTrac
announced US home foreclosure filings in the third quarter 2008
were 71% above the comparable period a year earlier.
Streamlined
modification process
The
adoption of this streamlined modification framework is an additional
tool that servicers will now have to help avoid preventable
foreclosures. This framework will not only help homeowners who
receive a streamlined modification, but will also further address
servicer capacity concerns by freeing up resources, helping
ensure that borrowers do not fall through the cracks because
servicers aren't able to get to them.
This
is the first time the industry has agreed on an industry standard.
The benchmark ratio for calculating the affordable payment is
38 percent of monthly gross household income. Once the affordable
payment is determined, there are several steps the servicer
can take to create that payment – extending the term, reducing
the interest rate, and forbearing interest. In the event that
the affordable payment is still beyond the borrower’s means,
the borrower’s situation will be reviewed on a case-by-case
basis using a cash flow budget. This program resulted from a
unified effort among the Enterprises, Hope Now and its 27 servicer
partners, Treasury, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA)
and FHFA. In addition, we’ve drawn on the FDIC’s experience
and assistance from developing the IndyMac streamlined approach
and have greatly benefited from the FDIC’s input and example.
To accommodate the need for more flexibility among a larger
number of servicers, the Streamlined Modification Program does
differ from the IndyMac model in a few areas. However, it uses
the same fundamental tools to achieve the same affordability
target.
The
Streamlined Modification Program (SMP) was developed in collaboration
with the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), the Department
of Treasury, Freddie Mac, and members of the HOPE NOW Alliance.
SMP
Eligibility Criteria Include
- Conforming
conventional or jumbo conforming mortgage loans originated
on or before January 1, 2008;
- At
least three payments past due;
- The
loan is secured by a one-unit property that is the borrower's
primary residence;
- Current
mark-to-market LTV of 90 percent or more; and
- Property
is not abandoned, vacant, condemned, or in a serious state
of disrepair.
- SMP
is designed to reduce distressed borrowers' monthly mortgage
payments to an amount equal to 38 percent of their monthly
gross income. To do so, servicers may, in the following
order:
- Capitalize
accrued interest, escrow advances and costs,if allowed by
state law;
- Extend
the term of the mortgage loan by up to 480 months;
- Reduce
the mortgage loan interest rate in increments of .125% to
a fixed rate that is not less than 3% (if this exercise
results in a below market rate, it will, after 5 years,
step up in annual increments to a market rate);
- As
a last resort, provide for principal forbearance, which
will result in a balloon payment fully due and payable upon
borrower's sale of the property or payoff or maturity of
the loan.
Borrowers
meeting the SMP eligibility requirements enter into a trial
period in which they must make monthly loan payments equal to
the proposed modified payment. Timely payments must be made
for three consecutive months before a borrower's loan can be
modified under the SMP.
The
"Streamlined Modification Plan," or SMP, which is an expansion
of what many
lenders
are already doing, will be implemented by December 15, 2008.
IndyMAC
Plan
With
the Bush administration refusing to enact FDIC Chairwoman Sheila
Bair's controversial loan modification plan, lawmakers are taking
matters into their own hands.
- Offer
proactive workout solutions designed to address borrowers
who have the willingness but limited capacity to pay.
- Return
the loan to a current status.
- Capitalize
delinquent interest and escrow.
- Modify
the loan terms based on waterfalls, starting at a front-end
38 percent HTI ratio down to a 31 percent HTI ratio subject
to a formal NPV floor.
- Reduce
interest rate to as low as 3 percent.
- Extend,
if necessary, the amortization and/or term of the loan to
40 years.
- Forbear
principal if necessary.
- Provide
borrowers the opportunity to stay in their home while making
an affordable payment for the life of the loan.
- Require
the borrower to make one payment at the time of the modification.
- Cap
the interest rate at the Freddie Mac Weekly Survey rate
effective as required to meet the target HTI ratio, fixing
the adjusted rate and monthly payment amount for 5 years.
- Step
up the initial interest rate gradually starting in year
6 by increasing it one percentage point each year until
reaching the Freddie Mac Weekly Survey rate cap.
- Use
a financial model with supportable assumptions to ensure
investor interests are protected.
- Input
borrower specific income information into the NPV Tool,
which provides a real-time workout solution.
- Perform
automated loan level underwriting across large segments
of the portfolio to support pre-approved bulk mailings.
- Verify
income information the borrower provided via check stubs,
tax returns, and/or bank statements.
- Compare
the cost of foreclosure to mitigate losses.
- Mandate
that the cost of the modification must be less than the
estimated foreclosure loss.
- The
loan is at least 60 days delinquent where the loan is considered
one day delinquent on the day following the next payment
due date. Many servicing contracts often contain a standard
clause allowing the servicer to modify seriously delinquent
or defaulted mortgages, or mortgages where default is “reasonably
foreseeable”.
- Foreclosure
sale is not imminent and the borrower is currently not in
bankruptcy, or has not been discharged from Chapter 7 bankruptcy
since the loan was originated.
- The
loan was not originated as a second home or an investment
property.
We
(IndyMac Bank) commend FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair for her leadership
in developing a systematic loan modification protocol. FHFA,
the GSEs and HOPE NOW relied heavily on the IndyMac model in
developing this new protocol.
Fannie
Mae / Freddie Mac Plan
In
the task at hand to make headway against foreclosures and the
depressed housing market. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac entered
a new phase on December 9, 2008 for a fast-track program meant
to make "hundreds of thousands of mortgages affordable to people
who can't currently meet their monthly payments."
Through
the SMP, servicers may change the terms of a loan to reduce
a borrower's first lien monthly mortgage payment, including
taxes, insurance and homeowners association payments, to an
amount equal to 38 percent of gross monthly income. The changes
in terms may include one or more of the following:
- Adding
the accrued interest, escrow advances and costs to the principal
balance of the loan, if allowed by state law;
- Extending
the length of the mortgage loan as appropriate;
- Reducing
the mortgage loan interest rate in increments of 0.125 percent
to an interest rate that is not less than 3 percent. If
the new rate is set below the market interest rate, after
five years it will step up in annual increments to either
the original loan interest rate or the market interest rate
at the time of the modification,whichever is lower;
- Forbearing
on a portion of the principal, which will require the borrower
to make a balloon payment when the loan matures, is paid
off, or is refinanced.
Eligibility
Requirements
- Conforming
conventional and jumbo conforming mortgage loans originated
on or before January 1, 2008;
- Borrowers
who are at least three or more payments past due and are
not currently in bankruptcy;
- Only
one-unit, owner-occupied, primary residences; and
- Current
mark-to-market loan-to-value ratio of 90 percent or more.
New
Servicer Guidance
Fannie
Mae's foreclosure prevention efforts have generally been made
available to a borrower only after a delinquency occurs. Under
Fannie Mae's new guidance, loan servicers can use foreclosure
prevention tools to assist distressed borrowers when a borrower
demonstrates the need. As noted above, these guidelines apply
to borrowers who are still current in their payments, but whose
default is reasonably foreseeable. This new guideline is effective
immediately.
Hope
for Homeowners Plan (HUD) / FHA)
The
H4H Program is effective for endorsements on or after October
1, 2008, through September 30, 2011.
- Affordability
versus value: lenders will take a loss on the difference
between the existing obligations and the new loan, which
is set at 96.5 percent of current appraised value. The lender
may choose to provide homeowners with an affordable monthly
mortgage payment through a loan modification rather than
accepting the losses associated with declining property
values.
- Borrower
eligibility: Lenders that determine the H4H program is a
feasible and effective option for mitigating losses will
assess the homeowner’s eligibility for the program:
- The
existing mortgage was originated on or before January 1,
2008;
- Existing
mortgage payment(s) as of March 1, 2008 exceeds 31 percent
of the borrowers gross monthly income for fixed-rate mortgages;
For Arms, the existing mortgage payment(s) exceeds 31 percent
of the borrowers gross monthly income as of March 1, 2008
OR the date of the new loan application.
- The
homeowner did not intentionally default, does not have an
ownership interest in other residential real estate and
has not been convicted of fraud in the last 10 years under
Federal and state law; and
- The
homeowner did not provide materially false information (e.g.,
lied about income) to obtain the mortgage that is being
refinanced into the H4H mortgage.
Original
Cost of Program
- 3 percent
upfront mortgage insurance premium and a 1.5 percent annual
premium,
- Equity
and appreciation sharing with the Federal government, and
- Prohibition
against new junior liens against the property unless they
are directly related to property maintenance.
- Please
also view the HUDS fact sheet (PDF) for full details
Updated
Hope for Homeowners Improvements
- Eliminates
3% upfront premium
- Reduces
1.5% annual premium to a range between .55% and .75%, based
on risk-based pricing (also makes technical fix to permit
discontinuation of fees when loan balance drops below certain
levels, consistent with normal FHA policy)
- Raises
maximum loan to value (LTV) from 90% to 93% for borrowers
above a 31% mortgage debt to income (DTI) ratio or above
a 43% ratio
- Eliminates
government profit sharing of appreciation over market value
of home at time of refi. Retains government declining share
(from 100% to 50% after five years) of equity created by
the refi, to be paid at time of sale or refi as an exit
fee
- Authorizes
payments to servicers participating in successful refis
- Administrative
simplification: (a) eliminates borrower certifications regarding
not intentionally defaulting on any debt, (b) eliminates
special requirement to collect 2 years of tax returns, (c)
eliminates originator liability for first payment default,
(d) eliminates March 1, 2008 31% DTI test, (e) eliminates
prohibition against taking out future second loans, (f)
requires Board to make documents, forms, and procedures
conform to those under normal FHA loans to the maximum extent
possible consistent with statutory requirements.
Troubled
Assets Relief Program (TARP)
The
systematic foreclosure prevention and mortgage modification
program under this section shall be a program established by
the Secretary, in consultation with the Chairperson of the Board
of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and
the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, that—
- Provides
lenders and loan servicers with certain compensation to
cover administrative costs for each loan modified according
to the required standards; and
- Provides
loss sharing or guarantees for certain losses incurred if
a modified loan should subsequently re-default.
Commitment
of Resources
The
comprehensive plan established pursuant to subsection (a) shall
require the commitment of funds made available to the Secretary
under title I of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of
2008 in an amount up to $100,000,000,000 but in no case less
than $40,000,000,000.
In
a press conference Tuesday, Federal Housing Finance Agency director
James Lockhart said the program would target high-risk borrowers
— those 90 or more days delinquent on their mortgages — and
employ various modification strategies to get borrowers down
to an “affordable” mortgage payment, defined as 38 percent of
a household’s monthly gross income on a first mortgage payment.
How
to Get a Loan Modification
- Call
your lender
- Call
Hope Now Hotline
- Go
through an attorney based loan modification specialist
Loan
Modification Companies
Loan
modification companies assess borrowers’ ability to pay through
analysis of wage statements, investment accounts, bank accounts
and tax returns, among other data. They then make proposals
to the lending institutions for restructuring of mortgage terms
in a fashion that will enhance the likelihood of repayment.
Loan
modification companies can be engaged by borrowers to negotiate
on their behalf. They also can be hired by lenders to help salvage
troubled loans. A given loan modification company may rely primarily
on one or the other sources of clients, or both.
Lenders
have an interest in offering concessions to troubled borrowers
because the costs of foreclosure are high. Among other things,
borrowers do not want to take possession of illiquid real estate,
especially in falling markets.
Billing
Loan
modification companies’ fees may be billed either to the borrower
or to the lender. If the company is engaged by the borrower,
the borrower may be assessed the fee, sometimes up front and
without guarantees of results. In other cases, even if the borrower
engages the company’s services, the lender may be charged the
fee, in the case of a successful re-negotiation.
Results
If
the request for a loan modification is rejected, you may want
to try it again in a couple months. Some lenders do not document
the loan modification attempt you make. They are often motivated
by changes in the housing market and their intent changes as
more and more loans go into default. It does not hurt to try
again. It is smart to work with a loan modification specialist,
a seasoned loan officer or an attorney who specializes in real
estate, mortgage lending and loan modifications. They understand
how to speak to loss mitigation department, personnel and can
get a general idea of the mood and trends of your lenders loss
mitigation department.
A
loan adjustment that is required by a Relief Act or a decision
or order of a court is not subject to any limitations on modification
provided in this Subsection 5.3(4)(Please Review link provided)and
may be entered into without regard to whether the Mortgage Loan
is in payment default.
ABOUT
DEBT NEGOTIATION
Debt
Negotiation is the process of negotiating with a creditor
to pay off a percentage of a balance owed on old bills,
invoices, lawsuits, liens, medical bills, utility bills,
and judgments. This process is commonly used in debt settlement
and debt arbitration. Since 30% of the 1.6 million bankruptcies
filed in 2005 occurred on debt that was current, it is
often in the best interest of creditors to negotiate management
debt repayment schedules with debtors experiencing hardship.
They do this through their own programs, promoted through
credit counseling, or through independent debt arbitrators
using debt negotiation.
|
ABOUT
A SHORT SALE
In
real estate, a short sale is a sale of real estate
in which the proceeds from the sale fall short of
the balance owed on a loan secured by the property
sold. In a short sale, the bank or mortgage lender
agrees to discount a loan balance due to an economic
or financial hardship on the part of the mortgagor.
This negotiation is all done through communication
with a bank's loss mitigation or workout department.
The home owner/debtor sells the mortgaged property
for less than the outstanding balance of the loan,
and turns over the proceeds of the sale to the lender,
sometimes (but not always) in full satisfaction
of the debt. In such instances, the lender would
have the right to approve or disapprove of a proposed
sale. Many Short Sales leave a deficiency balance
for which the Mortgagor / Borrower is still liable.
In 99% of all cases it is not a settlement-in-full.
A deficiency balance will remain as a potential
liability for the Mortgagor / Borrower. The bank's
opportunity of pursuit of a deficiency judgment
will vary from state to state.
Extenuating
circumstances influence whether or not banks will
discount a loan balance. These circumstances are
usually related to the current real estate market
and the borrower's financial situation.
A
short sale typically is executed to prevent a home
foreclosure, but the decision to proceed with a
short sale is predicated on the most economic way
for the bank to recover the amount owed on the property.
Often a bank will allow a short sale if they believe
that it will result in a smaller financial loss
than foreclosing as there are carrying costs that
are associated with a foreclosure. A bank will typically
determine the amount of equity (or lack of), by
determining the probable selling price from a Broker
Price Opinion BPO or through a valuation of an appraisal.
For the home owner, advantages include avoidance
of a foreclosure on their credit history and partial
control of the monetary deficiency. A short sale
is typically faster and less expensive than a foreclosure.
In short, a short sale is nothing more than negotiating
with lien holders a payoff for less than what they
are owed, or rather a sale of a debt, generally
on a piece of real estate, short of the full debt
amount. It does not extinguish the remaining balance
unless settlement is clearly indicated on the acceptance
of offer.
Short
sales are common in standard business transactions
in recognition that creditors are not doing debtors
a favor but, rather, engaging in a business transaction
when extending credit. When it makes no business
sense or is economically not feasible to retain
an asset, businesses default on their loans (called
bonds). It is not uncommon for business bonds to
trade on the after-market for a small fraction of
their face value in realization of the likelihood
of these future defaults.
Negotiations
Lenders
have a department (typically called "loss mitigation")
that processes potential short sale transactions.
Today, lenders may accept short sale offers or requests
for short sales even if a Notice of Default has
not been issued or recorded with the locality where
the property is located. Given the unprecedented
and overwhelming number of losses that mortgage
lenders have suffered from the current foreclosure
crisis, they are now more willing to accept short
sales than ever before. This is great news for borrowers
who are "underwater" or in other words those who
owe more on their mortgage than their property is
worth and are having trouble selling to avoid foreclosure
because of this. They are type of distressed borrower
who needs a short sale the most.
Lenders
have a varying tolerance for short sales and mitigated
losses. The majority of lenders have a predetermined
criteria for such transactions. Other distressed
lenders may allow any reasonable offer subject to
a loss mitigator's approval. Multiple levels of
approvals and conditions are very common with short
sales. Junior liens - such as second mortgages,
HELOC lenders, and HOA (special assessment liens)
- may need to approve the short sale. Frequent objectors
to short sales include tax lien holders (income,
estate or corporate franchise tax - as opposed to
real property taxes, which have priority even when
unrecorded) and mechanic's lien holders. It is possible
for junior lien holders to prevent the short sale.
If the lender required mortgage insurance on the
loan, the insurer will likely also be party to negotiations
as they may be asked to pay out a claim to offset
the lender's loss in the short sale. The wide array
of parties, parameters and processes involved in
a short sale makes it a relatively complex and highly
specialized type of real estate transaction which
is why unfortunately short sale deals have a high
failure rate and often do not close on time to save
homeowners from foreclosure when they are not handled
by a knowledgeable and experienced professional.
The best sources of knowledge and expertise in short
sales are short sale negotiators, loss mitigation
specialists, and real estate lawyers who specialize
in short sale.
Credit
reporting
A
short sale does adversely affect a person's credit
report, though the negative impact is typically
less than a foreclosure. Short sales are a type
of settlement. Like all entries except for bankruptcy,
short sales remain on a credit report for seven
years. Depending upon other credit information it
is typically possible to obtain another mortgage
1-3 years after a short sale.
While
it is frequent if not common for a lender to forgive
the balance of the loan in question, it is unlikely
that a lien holder that is not a mortgagee will
forgive any of their balance. Further, it is common
for a lender to omit updating mortgage balances
to reflect a zero balance after a short sale. However,
willfully misrepresenting information on a credit
report can constitute libel in some jurisdictions,
and lenders may be sued in civil court for engaging
in this behavior.
|
ALL
ABOUT HOME LOANS, MORTGAGE:
This
article is about the legal mechanisms
used to secure the performance of obligations,
including the payment of debts, with
property. For loans secured by mortgages,
such as residential housing loans, and
lending practices or requirements
A
mortgage is the transfer
of an interest in property (or
the equivalent in law - a charge)
to a lender as a security for
a debt - usually a loan of money.
While a mortgage in itself is
not a debt, it is the lender's
security for a debt. It is a
transfer of an interest in land
(or the equivalent) from the
owner to the mortgage lender,
on the condition that this interest
will be returned to the owner
when the terms of the mortgage
have been satisfied or performed.
In other words, the mortgage
is a security for the loan that
the lender makes to the borrower.
This
comes from the Old French "dead
pledge," apparently meaning
that the pledge ends (dies)
either when the obligation is
fulfilled or the property is
taken through foreclosure.
In
most jurisdictions mortgages
are strongly associated with
loans secured on real estate
rather than on other property
(such as ships) and in some
jurisdictions only land may
be mortgaged. A mortgage is
the standard method by which
individuals and businesses can
purchase real estate without
the need to pay the full value
immediately from their own resources.
The
cost to the borrower is measured
by the annual percentage rate
(APR), which is an effective
annual rate of interest and
fees paid by the borrower.
Participants
and variant terminology
Legal
systems in different countries,
while having some concepts in
common, employ different terminology.
However, in general, a mortgage
of property involves the following
parties.
Mortgage
lender
Mortgagee
is a party to whom property
is mortgaged, usually a lender.
Mortgage provides security to
the lender. Given the large
sum of money involved in financing
a property, a mortgage lender
will usually want security for
the loan that will provide a
claim upon that security and
will take precedence over other
creditors. A mortgage accomplishes
this security.
The
lender loans the money and registers
the mortgage with the title
to the property. The borrower
gives the lender the mortgage
as security for the loan, receives
the funds, makes the required
payments and maintains possession
of the property. The borrower
has the right to have the mortgage
discharged from the title once
the debt is paid. If the mortgagor
fails to repay the loan according
to the conditions set forth
by the lender, then the mortgagee
reserves the right to foreclose
on the property.
Borrower
Mortgagor
is a party who mortgages property.
A mortgagor owes the obligation
secured by the mortgage. Generally,
the debtor must meet the conditions
of the underlying loan or other
obligation and the conditions
of the mortgage. Otherwise,
the debtor usually runs the
risk of foreclosure of the mortgage
by the creditor to recover the
debt. Typically the debtors
will be the individual homeowners,
landlords or businesses who
are purchasing their property
by way of a loan.
Most
buyers of real property would
have difficulty saving enough
money to make an outright purchase
of real estate. The use of debt
increases a buyer's ability
to buy through a combination
of down payment and debt. As
a result a real estate transaction
seldom occurs without buyers
relying on borrowed funds.
Borrowing
for investment purposes
Aside
from the absence of large amount
of available money, there are
several reasons why an investor
(including a buyer of real estate)
might borrow funds. Some of
these include:
- To
diversify investments and
reduce overall risk by using
only part of the available
funds for any one investment.
However the mortgage loan
enables him to purchase more
assets than he would otherwise
been able to, and therefore
in general increases investment
risk rather than reducing
it.
- To
invest the borrowed funds
at a higher rate of interest
(yield) than the borrowing
rate; for example, a sum is
borrowed at an annual interest
rate of 7% per year and used
to invest in a project that
returns 10% per year. This
is likely to be speculative
and there is usually a possibility
that the project may turn
out to return less than 7%
per year or to lose money.
- To
free up equity for other purposes;
for example, a commercial
enterprise may prefer to use
funds to purchase inventory
or equipment instead of investing
only in land and buildings.
- To
obtain a tax benefit. In some
countries (such as Canada),
mortgage interest is not tax
deductible, but loans made
for investment purposes are.
Other
participants
Because
of the complicated legal exchange,
or conveyance, of the property,
one or both of the main participants
are likely to require legal
representation. The terminology
varies with legal jurisdiction;
see lawyer, solicitor and conveyancer.
Because
of the complex nature of many
markets the debtor may approach
a mortgage broker or financial
adviser to help them source
an appropriate creditor, typically
by finding the most competitive
loan.
The
debt is, in civil law jurisdictions,
referred to as hypothecation,
which may make use of the services
of a hypothecary to assist
in the hypothecation.
Default
on divided property
When
a tract of land is purchased
with a mortgage and then split
up and sold, the "inverse order
of alienation rule" applies
to decide parties liable for
the unpaid debt.
When
a mortgaged tract of land is
split up and sold, upon default,
the mortgagee first forecloses
on lands still owned by the
mortgagor and proceeds against
other owners in an 'inverse
order' in which they were sold.
For example, A acquires a 3-acre
(12,000 m2)
lot by mortgage then splits
up the lot into three 1-acre
(4,000 m2) lots
(A, B, and C), and sells lot
B to X, and then lot C to Y,
retaining lot A for himself.
Upon default, the mortgagee
proceeds against lot A first,
the mortgagor. If foreclosure
or repossession of lot A does
not fully satisfy the debt,
the mortgagee proceeds against
lot B, then lot C. The rationale
is that the first purchaser
should have more equity and
subsequent purchasers receive
a diluted share.
Legal
aspects
Mortgages may be legal or equitable.
Furthermore, a mortgage may
take one of a number of different
legal structures, the availability
of which will depend on the
jurisdiction under which the
mortgage is made. Common law
jurisdictions have evolved two
main forms of mortgage: the
mortgage by demise and the mortgage
by legal charge.
Mortgage
by demise
In
a mortgage by demise, the mortgagee
(the lender) becomes the owner
of the mortgaged property until
the loan is repaid or other
mortgage obligation fulfilled
in full, a process known as
"redemption". This kind of mortgage
takes the form of a conveyance
of the property to the creditor,
with a condition that the property
will be returned on redemption.
Mortgages
by demise were the original
form of mortgage, and continue
to be used in many jurisdictions,
and in a small minority of states
in the United States. Many other
common law jurisdictions have
either abolished or minimized
the use of the mortgage by demise.
For example, in England and
Wales this type of mortgage
is no longer available, by virtue
of the Land Registration Act
2002.
Mortgage
by legal charge
In
a mortgage by legal charge or
technically "a charge by deed
expressed to be by way of legal
mortgage", the debtor remains
the legal owner of the property,
but the creditor gains sufficient
rights over it to enable them
to enforce their security, such
as a right to take possession
of the property or sell it.
To
protect the lender, a mortgage
by legal charge is usually recorded
in a public register. Since
mortgage debt is often the largest
debt owed by the debtor, banks
and other mortgage lenders run
title searches of the real property
to make certain that there are
no mortgages already registered
on the debtor's property which
might have higher priority.
Tax liens, in some cases, will
come ahead of mortgages. For
this reason, if a borrower has
delinquent property taxes, the
bank will often pay them to
prevent the lienholder from
foreclosing and wiping out the
mortgage.
Equitable
mortgage
In
an equitable mortgage the lender
is secured by taking possession
of all the original title documents
of the property and by borrower's
signing a Memorandum of Deposit
of Title Deed (MODTD). This
document is an undertaking by
the borrower that he/she has
deposited the title documents
with the bank with his own wish
and will, in order to secure
the financing obtained from
the bank.
History
At
common law, a mortgage was a
conveyance of land that on its
face was absolute and conveyed
a fee simple estate, but which
was in fact conditional, and
would be of no effect if certain
conditions were met – usually,
but not necessarily, the repayment
of a debt to the original landowner.
Hence the word "mortgage" (a
legal term in French meaning
"dead pledge"). The debt was
absolute in form, and unlike
a "live pledge" was not conditionally
dependent on its repayment solely
from raising and selling crops
or livestock or simply giving
the crops and livestock raised
on the mortgaged land. The mortgage
debt remained in effect whether
or not the land could successfully
produce enough income to repay
the debt. In theory, a mortgage
required no further steps to
be taken by the creditor, such
as acceptance of crops and livestock
in repayment.
The
difficulty with this arrangement
was that the lender was absolute
owner of the property and could
sell it or refuse to re-convey
it to the borrower, who was
in a weak position. Increasingly
the courts of equity began to
protect the borrower's interests,
so that a borrower came to have
an absolute right to insist
on re-conveyance on redemption.
This right of the borrower is
known as the "equity of redemption".
This
arrangement, whereby the lender
was in theory the absolute owner,
but in practice had few of the
practical rights of ownership,
was seen in many jurisdictions
as being awkwardly artificial.
By statute the common law's
position was altered so that
the mortgagor would retain ownership,
but the mortgagee's rights,
such as foreclosure, the power
of sale, and the right to take
possession, would be protected.
In
the United States, those states
that have reformed the nature
of mortgages in this way are
known as lien states. A similar
effect was achieved in England
and Wales by the Law of Property
Act 1925, which abolished mortgages
by the conveyance of a fee simple.
Foreclosure
and non-recourse lending
In
most jurisdictions, a lender
may foreclose on the mortgaged
property if certain conditions –
principally, nonpayment of the
mortgage loan – apply.
Subject to local legal requirements,
the property may then be sold.
Any amounts received from the
sale (net of costs) are applied
to the original debt.
In
some jurisdictions, mortgage
loans are non-recourse loans:
if the funds recouped from sale
of the mortgaged property are
insufficient to cover the outstanding
debt, the lender may not have
recourse to the borrower after
foreclosure. In other jurisdictions,
the borrower remains responsible
for any remaining debt, through
a deficiency judgment. In some
jurisdictions, first mortgages
are non-recourse loans, but
second and subsequent ones are
recourse loans.
Specific
procedures for foreclosure and
sale of the mortgaged property
almost always apply, and may
be tightly regulated by the
relevant government. In some
jurisdictions, foreclosure and
sale can occur quite rapidly,
while in others, foreclosure
may take many months or even
years. In many countries, the
ability of lenders to foreclose
is extremely limited, and mortgage
market development has been
notably slower.
At
the start of 2008, 5.6% of all
mortgages in the United States
were delinquent. By the end
of the first quarter that rate
had risen, encompassing 6.4%
of residential properties. This
number did not include the 2.5%
of homes in foreclosure.
Mortgages
in the United States
Types
of mortgage instruments
Two
types of mortgage instruments
are commonly used in the United
States: the mortgage (sometimes
called a mortgage deed) and
the deed of trust.[7]
The
mortgage
In
all but a few states, a mortgage
creates a lien on the title
to the mortgaged property. Foreclosure
of that lien almost always requires
a judicial proceeding declaring
the debt to be due and in default
and ordering a sale of the property
to pay the debt.
Security
deed
The
deed to secure debt is a mortgage
instrument used in the state
of Georgia. Unlike a mortgage,
however, a security deed is
an actual conveyance of real
property in security of a debt.
Upon the execution of such a
deed, title passes to the grantee
or beneficiary (usually lender),
however the grantor (debtor)
maintains equitable title to
use and enjoy the conveyed land
subject to compliance with debt
obligations.
Security
deeds must be recorded in the
county where the land is located.
Although there is no specific
time within which such deeds
must be filed, the failure to
timely record the deed to secure
debt may affect priority and
therefore the ability to enforce
the debt against the subject
property.
The
deed of trust
The
deed of trust is a deed by the
borrower to a trustee for the
purposes of securing a debt.
In most states, it also merely
creates a lien on the title
and not a title transfer, regardless
of its terms. It differs from
a mortgage in that, in many
states, it can be foreclosed
by a non-judicial sale held
by the trustee. It is also possible
to foreclose them through a
judicial proceeding.
Most
"mortgages" in California are
actually deeds of trust. The
effective difference is that
the foreclosure process can
be much faster for a deed of
trust than for a mortgage, on
the order of 3 months rather
than a year. Because the foreclosure
does not require actions by
the court the transaction costs
can be quite a bit less.
Deeds
of trust to secure repayments
of debts should not be confused
with trust instruments that
are sometimes called deeds of
trust but that are used to create
trusts for other purposes, such
as estate planning. Though there
are superficial similarities
in the form, many states hold
deeds of trust to secure repayment
of debts do not create true
trust arrangements.
Mortgage
lien priority
Except
in those few states in the United
States that adhere to the title
theory of mortgages, either
a mortgage or a deed of trust
will create a mortgage lien
upon the title to the real property
being mortgaged. The lien is
said to "attach" to the title
when the mortgage is signed
by the mortgagor and delivered
to the mortgagee and the mortgagor
receives the funds whose repayment
the mortgage secures. Subject
to the requirements of the recording
laws of the state in which the
land is located, this attachment
establishes the priority of
the mortgage lien with respect
to most other liens on the property's
title.
Liens that have attached to
the title before the mortgage
lien are said to be senior to,
or prior to, the mortgage lien.
Those attaching afterward are
said to be junior or subordinate.
The purpose of this priority
is to establish the order in
which lien holders are entitled
to foreclose their liens in
an attempt to recover their
debts. If there are multiple
mortgage liens on the title
to a property and the loan secured
by a first mortgage is paid
off, the second mortgage lien
will move up in priority and
become the new first mortgage
lien on the title. Documenting
this new priority arrangement
will require the release of
the mortgage securing the paid
off loan.
|
|
ABOUT
MORTGAGE LOANS:
A
mortgage loan is a loan secured
by real property through the use of
a note which evidences the existence
of the loan and the encumbrance of that
realty through the granting of a mortgage
which secures the loan. However, the
word mortgage alone, in everyday
usage, is most often used to mean mortgage
loan.
A
home buyer or builder can obtain financing
(a loan) either to purchase or secure
against the property from a financial
institution, such as a bank, either
directly or indirectly through intermediaries.
Features of mortgage loans such as the
size of the loan, maturity of the loan,
interest rate, method of paying off
the loan, and other characteristics
can vary considerably.
Mortgage
loan basics
Basic
concepts and legal regulation
According
to Anglo-American property law, a mortgage
occurs when an owner (usually of a fee
simple interest in realty) pledges his
interest as security or collateral for
a loan. Therefore, a mortgage is an
encumbrance on property just as an easement
would be, but because most mortgages
occur as a condition for new loan money,
the word mortgage has become
the generic term for a loan secured
by such real property.
As
with other types of loans, mortgages
have an interest rate and are scheduled
to amortize over a set period of time;
typically 30 years. All types of real
property can, and usually are, secured
with a mortgage and bear an interest
rate that is supposed to reflect the
lender's risk.
Mortgage
lending is the primary mechanism used
in many countries to finance private
ownership of residential property. For
commercial mortgages see the separate
article. Although the terminology and
precise forms will differ from country
to country, the basic components tend
to be similar:
- Property:
the physical residence being financed.
The exact form of ownership will vary
from country to country, and may restrict
the types of lending that are possible.
- Mortgage:
the security created on the property
by the lender, which will usually
include certain restrictions on the
use or disposal of the property (such
as paying any outstanding debt before
selling the property).
- Borrower:
the person borrowing who either has
or is creating an ownership interest
in the property.
- Lender:
any lender, but usually a bank or
other financial institution.
- Principal:
the original size of the loan, which
may or may not include certain other
costs; as any principal is repaid,
the principal will go down in size.
- Interest:
a financial charge for use of the
lender's money.
- Foreclosure
or repossession: the possibility that
the lender has to foreclose, repossess
or seize the property under certain
circumstances is essential to a mortgage
loan; without this aspect, the loan
is arguably no different from any
other type of loan.
Many
other specific characteristics are common
to many markets, but the above are the
essential features. Governments usually
regulate many aspects of mortgage lending,
either directly (through legal requirements,
for example) or indirectly (through
regulation of the participants or the
financial markets, such as the banking
industry), and often through state intervention
(direct lending by the government, by
state-owned banks, or sponsorship of
various entities). Other aspects that
define a specific mortgage market may
be regional, historical, or driven by
specific characteristics of the legal
or financial system.
Mortgage
loans are generally structured as long-term
loans, the periodic payments for which
are similar to an annuity and calculated
according to the time value of money
formulae. The most basic arrangement
would require a fixed monthly payment
over a period of ten to thirty years,
depending on local conditions. Over
this period the principal component
of the loan (the original loan) would
be slowly paid down through amortization.
In practice, many variants are possible
and common worldwide and within each
country.
Lenders
provide funds against property to earn
interest income, and generally borrow
these funds themselves (for example,
by taking deposits or issuing bonds).
The price at which the lenders borrow
money therefore affects the cost of
borrowing. Lenders may also, in many
countries, sell the mortgage loan to
other parties who are interested in
receiving the stream of cash payments
from the borrower, often in the form
of a security (by means of a securitization).
In the United States, the largest firms
securitizing loans are Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac, which are government sponsored
enterprises.
Mortgage
lending will also take into account
the (perceived) riskiness of the mortgage
loan, that is, the likelihood that the
funds will be repaid (usually considered
a function of the creditworthiness of
the borrower); that if they are not
repaid, the lender will be able to foreclose
and recoup some or all of its original
capital; and the financial, interest
rate risk and time delays that may be
involved in certain circumstances.
Mortgage
loan types
There
are many types of mortgages used worldwide,
but several factors broadly define the
characteristics of the mortgage. All
of these may be subject to local regulation
and legal requirements.
- Interest:
interest may be fixed for the life
of the loan or variable, and change
at certain predefined periods; the
interest rate can also, of course,
be higher or lower.
- Term:
mortgage loans generally have a maximum
term, that is, the number of years
after which an amortizing loan will
be repaid. Some mortgage loans may
have no amortization, or require full
repayment of any remaining balance
at a certain date, or even negative
amortization.
- Payment
amount and frequency: the amount paid
per period and the frequency of payments;
in some cases, the amount paid per
period may change or the borrower
may have the option to increase or
decrease the amount paid.
- Prepayment:
some types of mortgages may limit
or restrict prepayment of all or a
portion of the loan, or require payment
of a penalty to the lender for prepayment.
The
two basic types of amortized loans are
the fixed rate mortgage (FRM) and adjustable
rate mortgage (ARM) (also known as a
floating rate or variable rate mortgage).
In many countries, floating rate mortgages
are the norm and will simply be referred
to as mortgages; in the United States,
fixed rate mortgages are typically considered
"standard." Combinations of fixed and
floating rate are also common, whereby
a mortgage loan will have a fixed rate
for some period, and vary after the
end of that period.
Historical
US Prime Rates
In
a fixed rate mortgage, the interest
rate, and hence periodic payment, remains
fixed for the life (or term) of the
loan. In the US, the term is usually
up to 30 years (15 and 30 being the
most common), although longer terms
may be offered in certain circumstances.
For a fixed rate mortgage, payments
for principal and interest should not
change over the life of the loan, although
ancillary costs (such as property taxes
and insurance) can and do change.
In
an adjustable rate mortgage, the interest
rate is generally fixed for a period
of time, after which it will periodically
(for example, annually or monthly) adjust
up or down to some market index. Common
indices in the US include the Prime
rate, the London Interbank Offered Rate
(LIBOR), and the Treasury Index ("T-Bill");
other indices are in use but are less
popular.
Adjustable
rates transfer part of the interest
rate risk from the lender to the borrower,
and thus are widely used where fixed
rate funding is difficult to obtain
or prohibitively expensive. Since the
risk is transferred to the borrower,
the initial interest rate may be from
0.5% to 2% lower than the average 30-year
fixed rate; the size of the price differential
will be related to debt market conditions,
including the yield curve.
Additionally,
lenders in many markets rely on credit
reports and credit scores derived from
them. The higher the score, the more
creditworthy the borrower is assumed
to be. Favorable interest rates are
offered to buyers with high scores.
Lower scores indicate higher risk for
the lender, and higher rates will generally
be charged to reflect the (expected)
higher default rates.
A
partial amortization or balloon loan
is one where the amount of monthly payments
due are calculated (amortized) over
a certain term, but the outstanding
principal balance is due at some point
short of that term. This payment is
sometimes referred to as a "balloon
payment" or bullet payment. The interest
rate for a balloon loan can be either
fixed or floating. The most common way
of describing a balloon loan
uses the terminology X due in Y, where
X is the number of years over which
the loan is amortized, and Y is the
year in which the principal balance
is due.
Other
loan types:
- Assumed
mortgage
- Balloon
mortgage
- Blanket
loan
- Bridge
loan
- Budget
loan
- Buydown
mortgage
- Commercial
loan
- Endowment
mortgage
- Equity
loan
- Flexible
mortgage
- Foreign
National mortgage
- Graduated
payment mortgage loan
- Hard
money loan
- Jumbo
mortgages
- Offset
mortgage
- Package
loan
- Participation
mortgage
- Reverse
mortgage
- Repayment
mortgage
- Seasoned
mortgage
- Term
loan or Interest-only loan
- Wraparound
mortgage
- Negative
amortization loan
- Non-conforming
mortgage
Loan
to value and downpayments
Upon
making a mortgage loan for purchase
of a property, lenders usually require
that the borrower make a downpayment,
that is, contribute a portion of the
cost of the property. This downpayment
may be expressed as a portion of the
value of the property (see below for
a definition of this term). The loan
to value ratio (or LTV) is the size
of the loan against the value of the
property. Therefore, a mortgage loan
where the purchaser has made a downpayment
of 20% has a loan to value ratio of
80%. For loans made against properties
that the borrower already owns, the
loan to value ratio will be imputed
against the estimated value of the property.
The
loan to value ratio is considered an
important indicator of the riskiness
of a mortgage loan: the higher the LTV,
the higher the risk that the value of
the property (in case of foreclosure)
will be insufficient to cover the remaining
principal of the loan.
Value:
appraised, estimated, and actual
Since
the value of the property is an important
factor in understanding the risk of
the loan, determining the value is a
key factor in mortgage lending. The
value may be determined in various ways,
but the most common are:
- Actual
or transaction value: this is usually
taken to be the purchase price of
the property. If the property is not
being purchased at the time of borrowing,
this information may not be available.
- Appraised
or surveyed value: in most jurisdictions,
some form of appraisal of the value
by a licensed professional is common.
There is often a requirement for the
lender to obtain an official appraisal.
- Estimated
value: lenders or other parties may
use their own internal estimates,
particularly in jurisdictions where
no official appraisal procedure exists,
but also in some other circumstances.
Equity
or homeowner's equity
The
concept of equity in a property refers
to the value of the property minus the
outstanding debt, subject to the definition
of the value of the property. Therefore,
a borrower who owns a property whose
estimated value is $400,000 but with
outstanding mortgage loans of $300,000
is said to have homeowner's equity of
$100,000.
Payment
and debt ratios
In
most countries, a number of more or
less standard measures of creditworthiness
may be used. Common measures include
payment to income (mortgage payments
as a percentage of gross or net income);
debt to income (all debt payments, including
mortgage payments, as a percentage of
income); and various net worth measures.
In many countries, credit scores are
used in lieu of or to supplement these
measures. There will also be requirements
for documentation of the creditworthiness,
such as income tax returns, pay stubs,
etc.; the specifics will vary from location
to location.
Some
lenders may also require a potential
borrower have one or more months of
"reserve assets" available. In other
words, the borrower may be required
to show the availability of enough assets
to pay for the housing costs (including
mortgage, taxes, etc.) for a period
of time in the event of the job loss
or other loss of income.
Many
countries have lower requirements for
certain borrowers, or "no-doc" / "low-doc"
lending standards that may be acceptable
in certain circumstances.
Standard
or conforming mortgages
Many
countries have a notion of standard
or conforming mortgages that define
a perceived acceptable level of risk,
which may be formal or informal, and
may be reinforced by laws, government
intervention, or market practice. For
example, a standard mortgage may be
considered to be one with no more than
70-80% LTV and no more than one-third
of gross income going to mortgage debt.
A
standard or conforming mortgage is a
key concept as it often defines whether
or not the mortgage can be easily sold
or securitized, or, if nonstandard,
may affect the price at which it may
be sold. In the United States, a conforming
mortgage is one which meets the established
rules and procedures of the two major
government-sponsored entities in the
housing finance market (including some
legal requirements). In contrast, lenders
who decide to make non-conforming loans
are exercising a higher risk tolerance
and do so knowing that they face more
challenge in reselling the loan. Many
countries have similar concepts or agencies
that define what are "standard" mortgages.
Regulated lenders (such as banks) may
be subject to limits or higher risk
weightings for nonstandard mortgages.
For example, banks in Canada face restrictions
on lending more than 75% of the property
value; beyond this level, mortgage insurance
is generally required (as of April 2007,
there is a proposal to raise this limit
to 80%).
Repaying
the capital
There
are various ways to repay a mortgage
loan; repayment depends on locality,
tax laws and prevailing culture.
Capital
and interest
The
most common way to repay a loan is to
make regular payments of the capital
(also called principal) and interest
over a set term. This is commonly referred
to as (self) amortization in
the US and as a repayment mortgage
in the UK. A mortgage is a form of annuity
(from the perspective of the lender),
and the calculation of the periodic
payments is based on the time value
of money formulas. Certain details may
be specific to different locations:
interest may be calculated on the basis
of a 360-day year, for example; interest
may be compounded daily, yearly, or
semiannually; prepayment penalties may
apply; and other factors. There may
be legal restrictions on certain matters,
and consumer protection laws may specify
or prohibit certain practices.
Depending
on the size of the loan and the prevailing
practice in the country the term may
be short (10 years) or long (50 years
plus). In the UK and US, 25 to 30 years
is the usual maximum term (although
shorter periods, such as 15-year mortgage
loans, are common). Mortgage payments,
which are typically made monthly, contain
a capital (repayment of the principal)
and an interest element. The amount
of capital included in each payment
varies throughout the term of the mortgage.
In the early years the repayments are
largely interest and a small part capital.
Towards the end of the mortgage the
payments are mostly capital and a smaller
portion interest. In this way the payment
amount determined at outset is calculated
to ensure the loan is repaid at a specified
date in the future. This gives borrowers
assurance that by maintaining repayment
the loan will be cleared at a specified
date, if the interest rate does not
change.
Interest
only
The
main alternative to capital and interest
mortgage is an interest only
mortgage, where the capital is not repaid
throughout the term. This type of mortgage
is common in the UK, especially when
associated with a regular investment
plan. With this arrangement regular
contributions are made to a separate
investment plan designed to build up
a lump sum to repay the mortgage at
maturity. This type of arrangement is
called an investment-backed mortgage
or is often related to the type of plan
used: endowment mortgage if an endowment
policy is used, similarly a Personal
Equity Plan (PEP) mortgage, Individual
Savings Account (ISA) mortgage or pension
mortgage. Historically, investment-backed
mortgages offered various tax advantages
over repayment mortgages, although this
is no longer the case in the UK. Investment-backed
mortgages are seen as higher risk as
they are dependent on the investment
making sufficient return to clear the
debt.
Until
recently it was not uncommon for interest
only mortgages to be arranged without
a repayment vehicle, with the borrower
gambling that the property market will
rise sufficiently for the loan to be
repaid by trading down at retirement
(or when rent on the property and inflation
combine to surpass the interest rate).
No
capital or interest
For
older borrowers (typically in retirement),
it may be possible to arrange a mortgage
where neither the capital nor interest
is repaid. The interest is rolled up
with the capital, increasing the debt
each year.
These
arrangements are variously called reverse
mortgages, lifetime mortgages or equity
release mortgages, depending on
the country. The loans are typically
not repaid until the borrowers die,
hence the age restriction. For further
details, see equity release.
Interest
and partial capital
In
the US a partial amortization or balloon
loan is one where the amount of monthly
payments due are calculated (amortized)
over a certain term, but the outstanding
capital balance is due at some point
short of that term. In the UK, a part
repayment mortgage is quite common,
especially where the original mortgage
was investment-backed and on moving
house further borrowing is arranged
on a capital and interest (repayment)
basis.
Foreclosure
and non-recourse lending
In
most jurisdictions, a lender may foreclose
the mortgaged property if certain conditions
- principally, nonpayment of the mortgage
loan - obtain. Subject to local legal
requirements, the property may then
be sold. Any amounts received from the
sale (net of costs) are applied to the
original debt. In some jurisdictions,
mortgage loans are non-recourse loans:
if the funds recouped from sale of the
mortgaged property are insufficient
to cover the outstanding debt, the lender
may not have recourse to the borrower
after foreclosure. In other jurisdictions,
the borrower remains responsible for
any remaining debt. In virtually all
jurisdictions, specific procedures for
foreclosure and sale of the mortgaged
property apply, and may be tightly regulated
by the relevant government; in some
jurisdictions, foreclosure and sale
can occur quite rapidly, while in others,
foreclosure may take many months or
even years. In many countries, the ability
of lenders to foreclose is extremely
limited, and mortgage market development
has been notably slower.
Mortgage
lending: United States
United
States mortgage process
In
the US, the process by which a mortgage
is secured by a borrower is called origination.
This involves the borrower submitting
an application and documentation related
to his/her financial history and/or
credit history to the underwriter. Many
banks now offer "no-doc" or "low-doc"
loans in which the borrower is required
to submit only minimal financial information.
These loans carry a higher interest
rate and are available only to borrowers
with excellent credit. Sometimes, a
third party is involved, such as a mortgage
broker. This entity takes the borrower's
information and reviews a number of
lenders, selecting the ones that will
best meet the needs of the consumer.
Loans
are often sold on the open market to
larger investors by the originating
mortgage company. Many of the guidelines
that they follow are suited to satisfy
investors. Some companies, called correspondent
lenders, sell all or most of their closed
loans to these investors, accepting
some risks for issuing them. They often
offer niche loans at higher prices that
the investor does not wish to originate.
If
the underwriter is not satisfied with
the documentation provided by the borrower,
additional documentation and conditions
may be imposed, called stipulations.
The meeting of such conditions can be
a daunting experience for the consumer,
but it is crucial for the lending institution
to ensure the information being submitted
is accurate and meets specific guidelines.
This is done to give the lender a reasonable
guarantee that the borrower can and
will repay the loan. If a third party
is involved in the loan, it will help
the borrower to clear such conditions.
The
following documents are typically required
for traditional underwriter review.
Over the past several years, use of
"automated underwriting" statistical
models has reduced the amount of documentation
required from many borrowers. Such automated
underwriting engines include Freddie
Mac's "Loan Prospector" and Fannie Mae's
"Desktop Underwriter". For borrowers
who have excellent credit and very acceptable
debt positions, there may be virtually
no documentation of income or assets
required at all. Many of these documents
are also not required for no-doc and
low-doc loans.
- Credit
Report
- 1003
— Uniform Residential Loan Application
- 1004
— Uniform Residential Appraisal Report
- 1005
— Verification Of Employment (VOE)
- 1006
— Verification Of Deposit (VOD)
- 1007
— Single Family Comparable Rent Schedule
- 1008
— Transmittal Summary
- Copy
of deed of current home
- Federal
income tax records for last two years
- Verification
of Mortgage (VOM) or Verification
of Payment (VOP)
- Borrower's
Authorization
- Purchase
Sales Agreement
- 1084A
and 1084B (Self-employed Income Analysis)
and 1088 (Comparative Income Analysis)
- used if borrower is self-employed
Predatory
mortgage lending
There
is concern in the US that consumers
are often victims of predatory mortgage
lending. The main concern is that mortgage
brokers and lenders, operating legally,
are finding loopholes in the law to
obtain additional profit. The typical
scenario is that terms of the loan are
beyond the means of the borrower. The
borrower makes a number of interest
and principal payments, and then defaults.
The lender then takes the property and
recovers the amount of the loan, and
also keeps the interest and principal
payments, as well as loan origination
fees.
Option
ARM
An
option ARM provides the option to pay
as little as the equivalent of an amortized
payment based on a 1% interest rate,
(please note this is not the actual
interest rate). As a result, the difference
between the monthly payment and the
interest on the loan is added to the
loan principal; the loan at this point
has negative amortization. In this respect,
an option ARM provides a form of equity
withdrawal (as in a cash-out refinancing)
but over a period of time.
The
option ARM gives a number of payment
choices each month (for example, the
equivalent of an amortized payment where
the interest rate 1%, interest only
based on actual interest rate, actual
30 year amortized payment, actual 15
year amortized payment). The interest
rate may adjust every month in accordance
with the index to which the loan is
tied and the terms of the specific loan.
These loans may be useful for people
who have a lot of equity in their home
and want to lower monthly costs; for
investors, allowing them the flexibility
to choose which payment to make every
month; or for those with irregular incomes
(such as those working on commission
or for whom bonuses comprise a large
portion of income).
One
of the important features of this type
of loan is that the minimum payments
are often fixed for each year for an
initial term of up to 5 years. The minimum
payment may rise each year a little
(payment size increases of 7.5% are
common) but remain the same for another
year. For example, a minimum payment
for year 1 may be $1,000 per month each
month all year long. In year 2 the minimum
payment for each month is $1,075 each
month. This is a gradual increase in
the minimum payment. The interest rate
may fluctuate each month, which means
that the extent of any negative amortization
cannot be predicted beyond worst-case
scenario as dictated by the terms of
the loan.
Option
ARM mortgages have been criticized on
the basis that some borrowers are not
aware of the implications of negative
amortization; that eventually option
Arms reset to higher payment levels
(an event called "recast" to amortize
the loan), and borrowers may not be
capable of making the higher monthly
payments; and that option Arms have
been used to qualify mortgages for individuals
whose incomes cannot support payments
higher than the minimum level.
Costs
Lenders
may charge various fees when giving
a mortgage to a mortgagor. These include
entry fees, exit fees, administration
fees and lenders mortgage insurance.
There are also settlement fees (closing
costs) the settlement company will charge.
In addition, if a third party handles
the loan, it may charge other fees as
well.
The
United States mortgage finance industry
Mortgage
lending is a major category of the business
of finance in the United States. Mortgages
are commercial paper and can be conveyed
and assigned freely to other holders.
In the US, the Federal government created
several programs, or government sponsored
entities, to foster mortgage lending,
construction and encourage home ownership.
These programs include the Government
National Mortgage Association (known
as Ginnie Mae), the Federal National
Mortgage Association (known as Fannie
Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation (known as Freddie Mac).
These programs work by buying a large
number of mortgages from banks and issuing
(at a slightly lower interest rate)
"mortgage-backed bonds" to investors,
which are known as mortgage-backed securities
(MBS).
This
allows the banks to quickly re-lend
the money to other borrowers (including
in the form of mortgages) and thereby
to create more mortgages than the banks
could with the amount they have on deposit.
This in turn allows the public to use
these mortgages to purchase homes, something
the government wishes to encourage.
The investors, meanwhile, gain low-risk
income at a higher interest rate (essentially
the mortgage rate, minus the cuts of
the bank and GSE) than they could gain
from most other bonds.
Securitization
is a momentous change in the way that
mortgage bond markets function, and
has grown rapidly in the last 10 years
as a result of the wider dissemination
of technology in the mortgage lending
world. For borrowers with superior credit,
government loans and ideal profiles,
this securitization keeps rates almost
artificially low, since the pools of
funds used to create new loans can be
refreshed more quickly than in years
past, allowing for more rapid outflow
of capital from investors to borrowers
without as many personal business ties
as the past.
The
greatly increased rate of lending led
(among other factors) to the United
States housing bubble of 2000-2006.
The growth of lightly regulated derivative
instruments based on mortgage-backed
securities, such as collateralized debt
obligations and credit default swaps,
is widely reported as a major causative
factor behind the 2007 sub-prime mortgage
financial crisis.
Second-layer
lenders in the US
A
group called second-layer lenders
became an important force in the residential
mortgage market in the latter half of
the 1960s. These federal credit agencies,
which include the Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corp., the Federal National
Mortgage Association, and the Government
National Mortgage Association, conduct
secondary market activities in the buying
and selling of loans and provide credit
to primary lenders in the form of borrowed
money. They do not have direct contact
with the individual consumer.
Federal
Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
The
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation,
sometimes known as Freddie Mac, was
established in 1970. This corporation
is designed to promote the flow of capital
into the housing market by establishing
an active secondary market in mortgages.
It may by law deal only with government-supervised
lenders such as savings and loan associations,
savings banks, and commercial banks;
its programs cover conventional whole
mortgage loans, participations in conventional
loans, and FHA and VA loans.
Federal
National Mortgage Association
The
Federal National Mortgage Association,
known in financial circles as Fannie
Mae, was chartered as a government corporation
in 1938, re-chartered as a federal agency
in 1954, and became a government-sponsored,
stockholder-owned corporation in 1968.
Fannie Mae, which has been described
as "a private corporation with a public
purpose", basically provides a secondary
market for residential loans. It fulfills
this function by buying, servicing,
and selling loans that, since 1970,
have included FHA-insured, VA-guaranteed,
and conventional loans. However, purchases
outrun sales by such a wide margin that
some observers view this association
as a lender with a permanent loan portfolio
rather than a powerful secondary market
corporation.
Government
National Mortgage Association
The
Government National Mortgage Association,
which is often referred to as Ginnie
Mae, operates within the Department
of Housing and Urban Development. In
addition to performing the special assistance,
management, and liquidation functions
that once belonged to Fannie Mae, Ginnie
Mae has an important additional function
— that of issuing guarantees of securities
backed by government-insured or guaranteed
mortgages. Such mortgage-backed securities
are fully guaranteed by the US government
as to timely payment of both principal
and interest.
Competition
among US lenders for loanable funds
To
be able to provide homebuyers and builders
with the funds needed, financial institutions
must compete for deposits. Consumer
lending institutions compete for loanable
funds not only among themselves but
also with the federal government and
private corporations. Called disintermediation,
this process involves the movement of
dollars from savings accounts into direct
market instruments: US Treasury obligations,
agency securities, and corporate debt.
One of the greatest factors in recent
years in the movement of deposits was
the tremendous growth of money market
funds whose higher interest rates attracted
consumer deposits.
To
compete for deposits, US savings institutions
offer many different types of plans:
- Passbook
or ordinary accounts — permit any
amount to be added to or withdrawn
from the account at any time.
- NOW
and Super NOW accounts — function
like checking accounts but earn interest.
A minimum balance may be required
on Super NOW accounts.
- Money
market accounts — carry a monthly
limit of preauthorized transfers to
other accounts or persons and may
require a minimum or average balance.
- Certificate
accounts — subject to loss of some
or all interest on withdrawals before
maturity.
- Notice
accounts — the equivalent of certificate
accounts with an indefinite term.
Savers agree to notify the institution
a specified time before withdrawal.
- Individual
retirement accounts (IRAs) and Keogh
accounts—a form of retirement savings
in which the funds deposited and interest
earned are exempt from income tax
until after withdrawal.
- Checking
accounts — offered by some institutions
under definite restrictions.
- Club
accounts and other savings accounts—designed
to help people save regularly to meet
certain goals.
The
mortgage loans industry and market
There
are currently over 200 significant separate
financial organizations supplying mortgage
loans to house buyers in Britain. The
major lenders include building societies,
banks, specialized mortgage corporations,
insurance companies, and pension funds.
Over the years, the share of the new
mortgage loans market held by building
societies has declined. Between 1977
and 1987, it fell drastically from 96%
to 66% while that of banks and other
institutions rose from 3% to 36%. The
banks and other institutions that made
major inroads into the mortgage market
during this period were helped by such
factors as:
- relative
managerial efficiency;
- advanced
technology, organizational capabilities,
and expertise in marketing;
- extensive
branch networks; and
- capacities
to tap cheaper international sources
of funds for lending.
By
the early 1990s, UK building societies
had succeeded in greatly slowing if
not reversing the decline in their market
share. In 1990, the societies held over
60% of all mortgage loans but took over
75% of the new mortgage market – mainly
at the expense of specialized mortgage
loans corporations. Building societies
also increased their share of the personal
savings deposits market in the early
1990s at the expense of the banks –
attracting 51% of this market in 1990
compared with 42% in 1989.
One study found that in the five years
1987-1992, the building societies collectively
outperformed the UK clearing banks on
practically all the major growth and
performance measures. The societies'
share of the new mortgage loans market
of 75% in 1990-91 was similar to the
share level achieved in 1985. Profitability
as measured by return on capital was
17.8% for the top 20 societies in 1991,
compared with only 8.5% for the big
four banks. Finally, bad debt provisions
relative to advances were only 0.4%
for the top 20 societies compared with
2.8% for the four banks.
Though
the building societies did subsequently
recover a significant amount of the
mortgage lending business lost to the
banks, they still only had about two-thirds
of the total market at the end of the
1980s. However, banks and building societies
were by now becoming increasingly similar
in terms of their structures and functions.
When the Abbey National building society
converted into a bank in 1989, this
could be regarded either as a major
diversification of a building society
into retail banking – or as significantly
increasing the presence of banks in
the residential mortgage loans market.
Research organization Industrial Systems
Research has observed that trends towards
the increased integration of the financial
services sector have made comparison
and analysis of the market shares of
different types of institution increasingly
problematical. It identifies as major
factors making for consistently higher
levels of growth and performance on
the part of some mortgage lenders in
the UK over the years:
- the
introduction of new technologies,
mergers, structural reorganization
and the realization of economies of
scale, and generally increased efficiency
in production and marketing operations
– insofar as these things enable lenders
to reduce their costs and offer more
price-competitive and innovative loans
and savings products;
- buoyant
retail savings receipts, and reduced
reliance on relatively expensive wholesale
markets for funds (especially when
interest rates generally are being
maintained at high levels internationally);
- lower
levels of arrears, possessions, bad
debts, and provisioning than competitors;
- increased
flexibility and earnings from secondary
sources and activities as a result
of political-legal deregulation; and
- being
specialized or concentrating on traditional
core, relatively profitable mortgage
lending and savings deposit operations.[6]
Mortgage
types
The
UK mortgage market is one of the most
innovative and competitive in the world.
Unlike some other countries, there is
little intervention in the market by
the state or state funded entities and
virtually all borrowing is funded by
either mutual organizations (building
societies and credit unions) or proprietary
lenders (typically banks). Since 1982,
when the market was substantially deregulated,
there has been substantial innovation
and diversification of strategies employed
by lenders to attract borrowers. This
has led to a wide range of mortgage
types.
As
lenders derive their funds either from
the money markets or from deposits,
most mortgages revert to a variable
rate, either the lender's standard
variable rate or a tracker rate,
which will tend to be linked to the
underlying Bank of England (BoE) repo
rate (or sometimes LIBOR). Initially
they will tend to offer an incentive
deal to attract new borrowers. This
may be:
- A
fixed rate; where the interest
rate remains constant for a set period;
typically for 2, 3, 4, 5 or 10 years.
Longer term fixed rates (over 5 years)
whilst available, tend to be more
expensive and/or have more onerous
early repayment charges and are therefore
less popular than shorter term fixed
rates.
- A
capped rate; where similar
to a fixed rate, the interest rate
cannot rise above the cap but
can vary beneath the cap. Sometimes
there is a collar associated
with this type of rate which imposes
a minimum rate. Capped rate are often
offered over periods similar to fixed
rates, e.g. 2, 3, 4 or 5 years.
- A
discount rate; where there
is set margin reduction in the standard
variable rate (e.g. a 2% discount)
for a set period; typically 1 to 5
years. Sometimes the discount is expressed
as a margin over the base rate (e.g.
BoE base rate plus 0.5% for 2 years)
and sometimes the rate is stepped
(e.g. 3% in year 1, 2% in year 2,
1% in year three).
- A
cashback mortgage; where a
lump sum is provided (typically) as
a percentage of the advance e.g. 5%
of the loan.
To
make matters more confusing these rates
are often combined: For example, 4.5%
2 year fixed then a 3 year tracker at
BoE rate plus 0.89%.
With
each incentive the lender may be offering
a rate at less than the market cost
of the borrowing. Therefore, they typically
impose a penalty if the borrower repays
the loan within the incentive period
or a longer period (referred to as an
extended tie-in). These penalties
used to be called a redemption penalty
or tie-in, however since the
onset of Financial Services Authority
regulation they are referred to as an
early repayment charge.
"Self
Cert" mortgage
Mortgage
lenders usually use salaries declared
on wage slips to work out a borrower's
annual income and will usually lend
up to a fixed multiple of the borrower's
annual income. Self Certification Mortgages,
informally known as "self cert" mortgages,
are available to employed and self employed
people who have a deposit to buy a house
but lack the sufficient documentation
to prove their income.
This
type of mortgage can be beneficial to
people whose income comes from multiple
sources, whose salary consists largely
or exclusively of commissions or bonuses,
or whose accounts may not show a true
reflection of their earnings. Self cert
mortgages have two disadvantages: the
interest rates charged are usually higher
than for normal mortgages and the loan
to value ratio is usually lower.
100%
mortgages
Normally
when a bank lends a customer money they
want to protect their money as much
as possible; they do this by asking
the borrower to fund a certain percentage
of the property purchase in the form
of a deposit.
100%
mortgages are mortgages that require
no deposit (100% loan to value). These
are sometimes offered to first time
buyers, but almost always carry a higher
interest rate on the loan.
Together/Plus
mortgages
A
development of the theme of 100% mortgages
is represented by Together/Plus type
mortgages, which have been launched
by a number of lenders in recent years.
Together/Plus
Mortgages represent loans of 100% or
more of the property value - typically
up to a maximum of 125%. Such loans
are normally (but not universally) structured
as a package of a 95% mortgage and an
unsecured loan of up to 30% of the property
value. This structure is mandated by
lenders' capital requirements which
require additional capital for loans
of 100% or more of the property value.
Recent
trends
July
28, 2008, US Treasury Secretary Henry
Paulson announced that, along with four
large US banks, the Treasury would attempt
to kick-start a market for these securities
in the US, primarily to provide an alternative
form of mortgage-backed securities.
Similarly, in the UK "the Government
is inviting views on options for a UK
framework to deliver more affordable
long-term fixed-rate mortgages, including
the lessons to be learned from international
markets and institutions".
More specifically, Mr. George Soros
issued a Wall Street Journal Opinion:
Denmark Offers a Model Mortgage Market.
- A survey of European Pfandbrief-like
products was issued in 2005 by the Bank
for International Settlements;
the International Monetary Fund in 2007
issued a study of the covered bond markets
in Germany and Spain,
while the European Central Bank in 2003
issued a study of housing markets, addressing
also mortgage markets and providing
a two page overview of current mortgage
systems in the EU countries.
History
While
the idea originated in Prussia in 1769,
a Danish act on mortgage credit associations
of 1850 enabled the issuing of bonds
(Danish: Realkreditobligationer) as
a means to refinance mortgage loans
.
With the German mortgage banks law of
1900, the whole German Empire was given
a standardized legal foundation for
the emission of Pfandbriefe. An account
from the perspective of development
economics is available.
Mortgage
insurance
Mortgage
insurance is an insurance policy
designed to protect the mortgagee (lender)
from any default by the mortgagor (borrower).
It is used commonly in loans with a
loan-to-value ratio over 80%, and employed
in the event of foreclosure and repossession.
This
policy is typically paid for by the
borrower as a component to final nominal
(note) rate, or in one lump sum up front,
or as a separate and itemized component
of monthly mortgage payment. In the
last case, mortgage insurance can be
dropped when the lender informs the
borrower, or its subsequent assigns,
that the property has appreciated, the
loan has been paid down, or any combination
of both to relegate the loan-to-value
under 80%.
In
the event of repossession, banks, investors,
etc. must resort to selling the property
to recoup their original investment
(the money lent), and are able to dispose
of hard assets (such as real estate)
more quickly by reductions in price.
Therefore, the mortgage insurance acts
as a hedge should the repossessing authority
recover less than full and fair market
value for any hard asset.
Islamic
mortgages
The
Sharia law of Islam prohibits the payment
or receipt of interest, which means
that practicing Muslims cannot use conventional
mortgages. However, real estate is far
too expensive for most people to buy
outright using cash: Islamic mortgages
solve this problem by having the property
change hands twice. In one variation,
the bank will buy the house outright
and then act as a landlord. The homebuyer,
in addition to paying rent, will pay
a contribution towards the purchase
of the property. When the last payment
is made, the property changes hands.
Typically,
this may lead to a higher final price
for the buyers. This is because in some
countries (such as the United Kingdom
and India) there is a Stamp Duty which
is a tax charged by the government on
a change of ownership. Because ownership
changes twice in an Islamic mortgage,
a stamp tax may be charged twice. Many
other jurisdictions have similar transaction
taxes on change of ownership which may
be levied. In the United Kingdom, the
dual application of Stamp Duty in such
transactions was removed in the Finance
Act 2003 in order to facilitate Islamic
mortgages.
An
alternative scheme involves the bank
reselling the property according to
an installment plan, at a price higher
than the original price.
Both
of these methods compensate the lender
as if they were charging interest, but
the loans are structured in a way that
in name they are not, and the lender
shares the financial risks involved
in the transaction with the homebuyer.
Other
terminologies
Like
any other legal system, the mortgage
business sometimes uses confusing jargon.
Below are some terms explained in brief.
If a term is not explained here it may
be related to the legal mortgage rather
than to the loan.
Advance
This is the money you have borrowed
plus all the additional fees.
Base
rate In UK, this is the base interest
rate set by the Bank of England. In
the United States, this value is set
by the Federal Reserve and is known
as the Discount Rate.
Bridging
loan This is a temporary loan that
enables the borrower to purchase a new
property before the borrower is able
to sell another current property.
Disbursements
These are all the fees of the solicitors
and governments, such as stamp duty,
land registry, search fees, etc.
Early
redemption charge / Prepayment penalty
/ Redemption penalty This is the
amount of money due if the mortgage
is paid in full before the time finished.
Equity
This is the market value of the property
minus all loans outstanding on it.
First
time buyer This is the term given
to a person buying property for the
first time.
Loan
origination fee A charge levied
by a creditor for underwriting a loan.
The fee often is expressed in points.
A point is 1 percent of the loan amount.
Sealing
fee This is a fee made when the
lender releases the legal charge over
the property.
Subject
to contract This is an agreement
between seller and buyer before the
actual contract is made.
|
ALL
ABOUT CALIFORNIA
The
State of California is a state located in
the western Pacific region of the United States
and was the 31st admitted to the Union. It
is the most populous state of the United States.
It is bordered by Oregon to the north, Nevada
to the east, and Arizona to the southeast
in the United States, as well as Baja California
in Mexico to the south. California's capital
city is Sacramento, with the four largest
cities being Los Angeles, San Diego, San Jose,
and San Francisco. California is known for
its diverse climate and geography, as well
as ethnically diverse population. The state
has 58 counties.
Before
becoming a part of the United States, Alta
California was colonized by the Spanish Empire
in 1769. After Mexican independence in 1821,
Alta California remained as part of Mexico
until 1846, when it was the independent California
Republic for one brief week. Following the
conclusion of the Mexican-American war of
1848, California was annexed by the United
States and was admitted to the Union as the
thirty-first state on September 9, 1850.
California
is the third largest state by area in the
US; its size gives it a diverse geography,
which ranges from sandy and rocky beaches
of the Pacific coast, to the rugged snowcapped
Sierra Nevada mountains in the east, to desert
areas in the southeast and the forests of
the northwest. The center portion of the state
is dominated by the Central Valley, one of
the most productive agricultural areas in
the world and the largest of any US state.
The Sierra Nevada mountains contain Yosemite
Valley, famous for its glacially-carved domes,
and Sequoia National Park, home to the giant
sequoia trees, the largest living organisms
on Earth. The state is home to Mount Whitney,
the highest point in the contiguous United
States,[2] as well as the second lowest and
hottest place in the Western Hemisphere, Death
Valley. Many of the trees located in the California
White Mountains are the oldest in the world;
one Bristlecone pine has an age of 4,700 years.
The
California Gold Rush began in 1848, dramatically
changing California to accommodate an influx
of population and an economic boom. The early
20th century was marked by Los Angeles becoming
the center of the entertainment industry,
in addition to the growth of a large tourism
sector in the state. Along with California's
prosperous agricultural industry, other industries
include aerospace, petroleum, and computer
and information technology. California ranks
among the top ten largest economies in the
world, and were it a separate country, it
would be 34th amongst the most populous countries,
just behind Poland, as well as the 6th World's
largest economy.
California borders the Pacific Ocean, Oregon,
Nevada, Arizona, and the Mexican state of
Baja California. With an area of 160,000 mi²
(411,000 km²) it is the third largest state
in the United States in size, after Alaska
and Texas.
California's geography is rich, complex, and
varied. In the middle of the state lies the
California Central Valley, bounded by the
coastal mountain ranges in the west, the Sierra
Nevada to the east, the Cascade Range in the
north and the Tehachapi Mountains in the south.
The Central Valley is California's agricultural
heartland and grows approximately one-third
of the nation's food.[5] Divided in two by
the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, the
northern portion, the Sacramento Valley serves
as the watershed of the Sacramento River,
while the southern portion, the San Joaquin
Valley is the watershed for the San Joaquin
River; both areas derive its name from the
rivers that transit them. With dredging, the
Sacramento and the San Joaquin Rivers have
remained sufficiently deep that several inland
cities are seaports. The Sacramento-San Joaquin
Bay Delta serves as a critical water supply
hub for the state. Water is routed through
an extensive network of canals and pumps out
of the delta, that traverse nearly the length
of the state, including the Central Valley
Project, and the State Water Project. Water
from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Bay Delta
provides drinking water for nearly 23 million
people, almost two-thirds of the state's population,
and provides water to farmers on the west
side of the San Joaquin Valley. The Channel
Islands are located off the southern coast.
The Sierra Nevada (Spanish for "snowy range")
include the highest peak in the contiguous
forty-eight states, Mount Whitney, at 14,505
ft (4,421 m), Yosemite National Park, and
the deep freshwater lake, Lake Tahoe, the
largest lake in the state by volume. To the
east of the Sierra Nevada are Owens Valley
and Mono Lake, an essential migratory bird
habitat. In the western part of the state
is Clear Lake, the largest freshwater lake
by area entirely in California. Though Lake
Tahoe is larger, it is divided by the California/Nevada
border. The Sierra Nevada falls to Arctic
temperatures in winter and has several dozen
small glaciers, including Palisade Glacier,
the southernmost glacier in the United States.
About
35% of the state's total surface area is covered
by forests, and California's diversity of
pine species is unmatched by any other state.
California contains more forest land than
any other state except Alaska. In the south
is a large inland salt lake, the Salton Sea.
Deserts in California make up about 25% of
the total surface area. The south-central
desert is called the Mojave; to the northeast
of the Mojave lies Death Valley, which contains
the lowest, hottest point in North America,
Badwater Flat. The distance from the lowest
point of Death Valley to the peak of Mount
Whitney is less than 200 miles (322 km). Indeed,
almost all of southeastern California is arid,
hot desert, with routine extreme high temperatures
during the summer.
Along
the California coast are several major metropolitan
areas, including Greater Los Angeles, the
San Francisco Bay Area, and San Diego.
By
2007, California's population has reached
37,700,000, making it the most populated state,
and is the 13th fastest-growing state. This
includes a natural increase since the last
census of 1,909,368 people (that is 3,375,297
births minus 1,465,929 deaths) and an increase
due to net migration of 774,198 people into
the state. Immigration from outside the United
States resulted in a net increase of 1,724,790
people, and migration within the country produced
a net decrease of 950,592.[10] According to
the Sacramento News & Review, California's
population will increase to 50 million people
by 2025.[11]
California
is the second most populous state in the Western
Hemisphere, exceeded only by São Paulo State,
Brazil. More than 12 percent of US citizens
live in California and its population is greater
than that of all but 34 countries of the world.
California has eight of the top 50 US cities
in terms of population. Los Angeles is the
nation's second-largest city with a population
of 3,849,378 people, followed by San Diego
(8th), San Jose (10th), San Francisco (14th),
Long Beach (34th), Fresno (36th), Sacramento
(37th) and Oakland (44th). Los Angeles County
has held the title of most populous county
for decades, and is more populous than 42
US states. The center of population of California
is at the town of Buttonwillow in Kern County.
As of 2005, The gross state product (GSP)
is about $1.62 trillion, the largest in the
United States. California is responsible for
13% of the United States gross domestic product
(GDP). As of 2005, California's GDP is larger
than all but seven countries in the world
(and all but eight countries by Purchasing
Power Parity).
California is also the home of several significant
economic regions, such as Hollywood (entertainment),
the California Central Valley (agriculture),
the Silicon Valley and Tech Coast (computers
and high tech), and wine producing regions,
such as the Napa Valley, Sonoma Valley and
Southern California's Santa Barbara and Paso
Robles areas.
The
predominant industry, more than twice as large
as the next, is agriculture, (including fruit,
vegetables, dairy, and wine). This is followed
by aerospace; entertainment, primarily television
by dollar volume, although many movies are
still made in California; music production
and recording studios; light manufacturing,
including computer hardware and software;
and the mining of borax. Oil drilling has
played a significant role in the development
of the state.
Per
capita personal income was $38,956 as of 2006,
ranking 11th in the nation. Per capita income
varies widely by geographic region and profession.
The Central Valley is the most impoverished,
with migrant farm workers making less than
minimum wage. Recently, the San Joaquin Valley
was characterized as one of the most economically
depressed regions in the US, on par with the
region of Appalachia.
Many
coastal cities include some of the wealthiest
per-capita areas in the US The high-technology
sectors in Northern California, specifically
Silicon Valley, in Santa Clara and San Mateo
counties, are currently emerging from economic
downturn caused by the dot.com bust, which
caused the loss of over 250,000 jobs in Northern
California alone. As of spring 2005, economic
growth has resumed in California at 4.3%.
California
levies a 9.3% maximum variable rate income
tax, with 6 tax brackets. It collects about
$40 billion per year in income taxes. California's
combined state, county and local sales tax
rate is from 7.25 to 8.75%. The rate varies
throughout the state at the local level. In
all, it collects about $28 billion in sales
taxes per year. All real property is taxable
annually, the tax based on the property's
fair market value at the time of purchase.
This tax does not increase based on a rise
in real property values (see Proposition 13).
California collects $33 billion in property
taxes per year.
The
state of California has 478 incorporated cities
and towns, of which 456 are cities and 22
are towns. Under California law, the terms
"city" and "town" are explicitly interchangeable;
the name of an incorporated municipality in
the state can either by "City of (Name)" or
"Town of (Name)." Please find the list below:
|
A
| City |
County |
Incorporated |
| Adelanto |
San Bernardino |
December
22, 1970
|
| Agoura
Hills |
Los Angeles |
December
8, 1982
|
| Alameda |
Alameda |
April
19, 1854
|
| Albany |
Alameda |
September
22, 1908
|
| Alhambra |
Los Angeles |
July
11, 1903
|
| Aliso
Viejo |
Orange |
July
1, 2001
|
| Alturas |
Modoc |
September
16, 1901
|
| Amador
City |
Amador |
June
2, 1915
|
| American
Canyon |
Napa |
January
1, 1992
|
| Anaheim |
Orange |
March
18, 1876
|
| Anderson |
Shasta |
January
16, 1956
|
| Angels
Camp |
Calaveras |
January
24, 1912
|
| Antioch |
Contra Costa |
February
6, 1872
|
| Apple
Valley * |
San Bernardino |
November
28, 1988
|
| Arcadia |
Los Angeles |
August
5, 1903
|
| Arcata |
Humboldt |
February
2, 1858
|
| Arroyo
Grande |
San Luis Obispo |
July
10, 1911
|
| Artesia |
Los Angeles |
May
29, 1959
|
| Arvin |
Kern |
December
21, 1960
|
| Atascadero |
San Luis Obispo |
July
2, 1979
|
| Atherton
* |
San Mateo |
September
12, 1923
|
| Atwater |
Merced |
August
16, 1922
|
| Auburn |
Placer |
May
2, 1888
|
| Avalon |
Los Angeles |
June
26, 1913
|
| Avenal |
Kings |
September
11, 1979
|
| Azusa |
Los Angeles |
December
29, 1898
|
|
B
| City |
County |
Incorporated |
| Bakersfield |
Kern |
January
11, 1898
|
| Baldwin
Park |
Los Angeles |
January
25, 1956
|
| Banning |
Riverside |
February
6, 1913
|
| Barstow |
San Bernardino |
September
30, 1947
|
| Beaumont |
Riverside |
November
18, 1912
|
| Bell |
Los Angeles |
November
7, 1927
|
| Bell
Gardens |
Los Angeles |
August
1, 1961
|
| Bellflower |
Los Angeles |
September
3, 1957
|
| Belmont |
San Mateo |
October
29, 1926
|
| Belvedere |
Marin |
December
24, 1896
|
| Benicia |
Solano |
March
27, 1850
|
| Berkeley |
Alameda |
April
4, 1878
|
| Beverly
Hills |
Los Angeles |
January
28, 1914
|
| Big
Bear Lake |
San Bernardino |
November
28, 1980
|
| Biggs |
Butte |
June
26, 1903
|
| Bishop |
Inyo |
May
6, 1903
|
| Blue
Lake |
Humboldt |
April
23, 1910
|
| Blythe |
Riverside |
July
21, 1916
|
| Bradbury |
Los Angeles |
July
26, 1957
|
| Brawley |
Imperial |
April
6, 1908
|
| Brea |
Orange |
February
23, 1917
|
| Brentwood |
Contra Costa |
January
21, 1948
|
| Brisbane |
San Mateo |
November
27, 1961
|
| Buellton |
Santa Barbara |
February
1, 1992
|
| Buena
Park |
Orange |
January
27, 1953
|
| Burbank |
Los Angeles |
July
8, 1911
|
| Burlingame |
San Mateo |
June
6, 1908
|
|
C
| City |
County |
Incorporated |
| Calabasas |
Los Angeles |
April
5, 1991
|
| Calexico |
Imperial |
April
16, 1908
|
| California
City |
Kern |
December
10, 1965
|
| Calimesa |
Riverside |
December
1, 1990
|
| Calipatria |
Imperial |
February
28, 1919
|
| Calistoga |
Napa |
January
6, 1886
|
| Camarillo |
Ventura |
October
22, 1964
|
| Canyon
Lake |
Riverside |
December
1, 1990
|
| Capitola |
Santa Cruz |
January
11, 1949
|
| Carlsbad |
San Diego |
July
16, 1952
|
| Carmel-by-the-Sea |
Monterey |
October
31, 1916
|
| Carpinteria |
| | | | | | |